High volatile anaesthetic conservation with a digital in-line vaporizer and a reflector

Abstract

Background: A volatile anaesthetic (VA) reflector can reduce VA consumption (VAC) at the cost of fine control of its delivery and CO₂ accumulation. A digital in-line vaporizer and a second CO₂ absorber circumvent both of these limitations. We hypothesized that the combination of a VA reflector with an in-line vaporizer would yield substantial VA conservation, independent of fresh gas flow (FGF) in a circle circuit, and provide fine control of inspired VA concentrations.

Method: Prospective observational study on six Yorkshire pigs. A secondary anaesthetic circuit consisting of a Y-piece with 2 one-way valves, an in-line vaporizer and a CO₂ absorber in the inspiratory limb was connected to the patient's side of the VA reflector. The other side was connected to the Y-piece of a circle anaesthetic circuit. In six pigs, an inspired concentration of sevoflurane of 2.5% was maintained by the in-line vaporizer. We measured VAC at FGF of 1, 4 and 10 l/min.

Results: With the secondary circuit, VAC was 55% less than with the circle system alone at FGF 1 l/min, and independent of FGF over the range of 1-10 l/min. Insertion of a CO₂ absorber in the secondary circuit reduced P_et CO₂ by 1.3-2.0 kpa (10-15 mmHg).

Conclusion: A secondary circuit with reflector and in-line vaporizer provides highly efficient anaesthetic delivery, independent of FGF. A second CO₂ absorber was necessary to scavenge the CO₂ reflected by the anaesthetic reflector. This secondary circuit may turn any open circuit ventilator into an anaesthetic delivery unit.