Cost effectiveness analysis comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to antidepressant medications after a first treatment failure for major depressive disorder in newly diagnosed patients - A lifetime analysis
- PMID: 29073256
- PMCID: PMC5658110
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186950
Cost effectiveness analysis comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to antidepressant medications after a first treatment failure for major depressive disorder in newly diagnosed patients - A lifetime analysis
Abstract
Objective: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) commonly is used for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) after patients have failed to benefit from trials of multiple antidepressant medications. No analysis to date has examined the cost-effectiveness of rTMS used earlier in the course of treatment and over a patients' lifetime.
Methods: We used lifetime Markov simulation modeling to compare the direct costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) of rTMS and medication therapy in patients with newly diagnosed MDD (ages 20-59) who had failed to benefit from one pharmacotherapy trial. Patients' life expectancies, rates of response and remission, and quality of life outcomes were derived from the literature, and treatment costs were based upon published Medicare reimbursement data. Baseline costs, aggregate per year quality of life assessments (QALYs), Monte Carlo simulation, tornado analysis, assessment of dominance, and one way sensitivity analysis were also performed. The discount rate applied was 3%.
Results: Lifetime direct treatment costs, and QALYs identified rTMS as the dominant therapy compared to antidepressant medications (i.e., lower costs with better outcomes) in all age ranges, with costs/improved QALYs ranging from $2,952/0.32 (older patients) to $11,140/0.43 (younger patients). One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the model was most sensitive to the input variables of cost per rTMS session, monthly prescription drug cost, and the number of rTMS sessions per year.
Conclusion: rTMS was identified as the dominant therapy compared to antidepressant medication trials over the life of the patient across the lifespan of adults with MDD, given current costs of treatment. These models support the use of rTMS after a single failed antidepressant medication trial versus further attempts at medication treatment in adults with MDD.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder.BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 28;22(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9. BMC Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35764989 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation versus Antidepressant Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression.Value Health. 2015 Jul;18(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.04.004. Value Health. 2015. PMID: 26297087
-
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Economic Analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Mar 1;16(6):1-51. eCollection 2016. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016. PMID: 27110317 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The clinical effectiveness and cost of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy in severe depression: a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jul;11(24):1-54. doi: 10.3310/hta11240. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17580003 Clinical Trial.
-
[Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression: response factor].Encephale. 2012 Sep;38(4):360-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.08.004. Epub 2011 Oct 11. Encephale. 2012. PMID: 22980479 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Non-Invasive Neuromodulation Methods to Alleviate Symptoms of Huntington's Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature.J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 2;12(5):2002. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052002. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902788 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Revisiting the Rotational Field TMS Method for Neurostimulation.J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 27;12(3):983. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030983. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36769630 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Promising Approach to Optimizing Sequential Treatment Decisions for Depression: Markov Decision Process.Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Nov;40(11):1015-1032. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01185-z. Epub 2022 Sep 14. Pharmacoeconomics. 2022. PMID: 36100825 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation may be a cost-effective alternative to antidepressant therapy after two treatment failures in patients with major depressive disorder.BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 28;22(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04078-9. BMC Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35764989 Free PMC article.
-
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Neurological Diseases.Front Neurol. 2022 May 20;13:793253. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.793253. eCollection 2022. Front Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35669870 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Magstim rTMS. Available from: https://www.magstim.com/clinical-area/rtms-for-major-depressive-disorder... Cited 28 June 2017.
-
- Brainsway Deep TMS therapy. Available from: http://www.brainsway.com/us Cited 6 September 2016.
-
- Magventure MagVita TMS therapy.Available from: http://www.magventure.com/en-gb/FDA-cleared-TMS-depression-treatment Cited 6 September 2016.
-
- Neuronetics Neurostar TMS therapy. Available from: http://www.neuronetics.com/products-services/system/ Cited 7 September 2016.
-
- Neurosoft TMS therapy. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf16/K160309.pdf Cited 31 May 2017.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
