Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep 29:5:257.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00257. eCollection 2017.

A Community-Based Intervention Program to Enhance Family Communication and Family Well-being: The Learning Families Project in Hong Kong

Chen Shen  1 , Alice Wan  1 , Lit Tung Kwok  2 , Sally Pang  2 , Xin Wang  1 , Sunita M Stewart  3 , Tai Hing Lam  1 , Sophia Siu Chee Chan  4
Affiliations
Free PMC article

A Community-Based Intervention Program to Enhance Family Communication and Family Well-being: The Learning Families Project in Hong Kong

Chen Shen et al. Front Public Health. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Family communication is important to maintain family relationships and family well-being. To enhance family communication and family well-being, a community-based "Learning Families Project," based on the social ecological model was developed in Kwun Tong in Hong Kong, a district with high prevalence of family problems.

Methods: This quasi-experimental study included two nearby government subsidized low-rent housing estates separated by busy main roads, as the intervention [Tsui Ping (South) Estate] and control (Shun Tin Estate) estate. The main intervention was resident training programs, such as talks, day camps, and thematic activities. No program was implemented in the control estate. Participants in the intervention group received assessments before the intervention (T1), immediately after the intervention (T2), and 6 weeks after the intervention (T3). Control group participants were assessed at baseline (March to April 2011) and follow-up (December 2011 to March 2012). Assessments of family communication (time and perceived adequacy) and family well-being (harmony, happiness, and health) at T1 and T3 were obtained in the intervention group to examine within-group changes. In addition, these differences in outcomes in the intervention group were compared with those in the control group to examine the effectiveness of the intervention.

Results: Family communication time and perceived communication adequacy increased significantly in the intervention group (n = 515) with a small effect size (Cohen effect d: 0.10 and 0.24, respectively). Compared with the control group (n = 476), the improvements in family communication time and perceived communication adequacy (Cohen effect d: 0.13 and 0.14, respectively), and perceived family harmony and happiness (Cohen effect d: 0.12 and 0.12, respectively) were significantly greater in the intervention group, adjusting for age and education, suggesting the intervention was effective in improving family communication and family well-being. Mediation analysis showed that perceived communication adequacy mediated the effects of the intervention on family harmony [β = 0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03, 0.18], happiness (β = 0.12, 95% CI 0.04, 0.20), and health (β = 0.10, 95% CI 0.02, 0.17), adjusting for age and education.

Conclusion: This community intervention based on the social ecological model improved family well-being through improving family communication, which could be an effective target to promote family well-being in other communities.

Trial registration: This study was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02851667. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02851667?term=02851667&rank=1.

Keywords: community engagement; community-based intervention; family; mediation analysis; social ecological model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pathway of intervention on outcomes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The flow diagram of participants in the intervention group.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging (2000) 15(2):187.10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.187 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mason MJ, Schmidt C, Abraham A, Walker L, Tercyak K. Adolescents’ social environment and depression: social networks, extracurricular activity, and family relationship influences. J Clin Psychol Med Settings (2009) 16(4):346–54.10.1007/s10880-009-9169-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Milevsky A, Schlechter M, Netter S, Keehn D. Maternal and paternal parenting styles in adolescents: associations with self-esteem, depression and life-satisfaction. J Child Fam Stud (2007) 16(1):39–47.10.1007/s10826-006-9066-5 - DOI
    1. Wickrama K, Lorenz FO, Wallace LE, Peiris L, Conger RD, Elder GH. Family influence on physical health during the middle years: the case of onset of hypertension. J Marriage Fam (2001) 63(2):527–39.10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00527.x - DOI
    1. Meireles AL, Xavier CC, de Souza Andrade AC, Proietti FA, Caiaffa WT. Self-rated health among urban adolescents: the roles of age, gender, and their associated factors. PLoS One (2015) 10(7):e0132254.10.1371/journal.pone.0132254 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources