Receipt of Warnings Regarding Potentially Impairing Prescription Medications and Associated Risk Perceptions in a National Sample of U.S. Drivers
- PMID: 29087813
- PMCID: PMC5668990
- DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.805
Receipt of Warnings Regarding Potentially Impairing Prescription Medications and Associated Risk Perceptions in a National Sample of U.S. Drivers
Abstract
Objective: Reducing drug-involved driving is a national policy priority, but little is known about the extent to which drivers receive warnings about the impairment potential of their prescribed medications. We used data from the 2013-2014 National Roadside Survey (NRS) to quantify the proportion of drivers who received warnings regarding potentially impairing medications and the association with driving-related risk perceptions.
Method: Drivers randomly selected at 60 sites completed the self-administered survey, which contained questions on their use of prescription medications.
Results: Overall, 7,405 drivers completed the prescription drug portion of the NRS. Of these, 19.7% reported recent use (within the past 2 days) of a potentially impairing prescription drug, and 78.2% said the drug had been prescribed for their use. Users of prescribed sedatives (85.8%) and narcotics (85.1%) were most likely to report receiving information about potential impairment, compared with only 57.7% and 62.6% of users of prescribed stimulant and antidepressant medications, respectively. Receipt of warnings varied by sex, race/ethnicity, income, geographic region, and time of day. For a majority of drug categories, drivers who reported receiving warnings had significantly higher odds of perceived risk of impaired driving/crash and criminal justice involvement.
Conclusions: Most users of prescription medications reported that the drug was prescribed for their use, but not all reported receiving warnings about driving impairment. Our study provides evidence of missed opportunities for information provision on impaired driving, identifies subgroups that may warrant enhanced interventions, and provides preliminary evidence that receipt of impairment warnings is associated with increased perceptions of driving-related risk.
Comment in
-
Reflections on Pollini et al. (2017)-Implications for Interventions for Driving While Using Psychotropic Medications With Impairment Risk.J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Nov;78(6):814-816. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.814. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017. PMID: 29087814 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence of Self-Reported Prescription Drug Use in a National Sample of U.S. Drivers.J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Jan;78(1):30-38. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.30. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017. PMID: 27936362 Free PMC article.
-
Medications and risk of motor vehicle collision responsibility in British Columbia, Canada: a population-based case-control study.Lancet Public Health. 2021 Jun;6(6):e374-e385. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00027-X. Epub 2021 Apr 20. Lancet Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33887232
-
Driving Advice with Prescription of Benzodiazepines and Z-drugs.Ir Med J. 2019 Dec 16;112(10):1028. Ir Med J. 2019. PMID: 32311246 No abstract available.
-
Effects of benzodiazepines, antidepressants and opioids on driving: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological and experimental evidence.Drug Saf. 2011 Feb 1;34(2):125-56. doi: 10.2165/11539050-000000000-00000. Drug Saf. 2011. PMID: 21247221 Review.
-
[Driving under the influence of benzodiazepines and antidepressants: prescription and abuse].Acta Med Port. 2011 May-Jun;24(3):431-8. Epub 2011 Aug 12. Acta Med Port. 2011. PMID: 22015031 Review. Portuguese.
Cited by
-
Optimizing sobriety checkpoints to maximize public health benefits and minimize operational costs.Inj Epidemiol. 2023 Mar 13;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40621-023-00427-8. Inj Epidemiol. 2023. PMID: 36915163 Free PMC article.
-
Randomly controlled drivers using minimally invasive sampling: assessment of drug prevalence in Western Switzerland over two time periods.BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 28;22(1):2446. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14883-2. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36577956 Free PMC article.
-
Association between prescribed opioid dose and risk of motor vehicle crashes.Pain. 2023 Apr 1;164(4):e228-e236. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002790. Epub 2022 Sep 26. Pain. 2023. PMID: 36155384 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing changes in medication-taking and driving behavior after warnings about prescription medications that prohibit driving: an online survey.BMC Public Health. 2022 May 21;22(1):1020. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13407-2. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35596168 Free PMC article.
-
Addendum - Coronavirus Disease 2019: What Could Be the Effects on Road Safety?Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jan;149:105712. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105712. Epub 2020 Aug 6. Accid Anal Prev. 2021. PMID: 32807368 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Barkley R. A., Cox D. A review of driving risks and impairments associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the effects of stimulant medication on driving performance. Journal of Safety Research. 2007;38:113–128. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2006.09.004. - PubMed
-
- Berning A., Compton R., Wochinger K. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration; 2015. Results of the 2013–2014 National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers (Traffic Safety Facts Research Note. Report No. DOT HS 812 118)
-
- Conley T. B. Construct validity of the MAST and AUDIT with multiple offender drunk drivers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2001;20:287–295. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00159-3. - PubMed
-
- Cottler L. B., Grant B. F., Blaine J., Mavreas V., Pull C., Hasin D., Mager D. Concordance of DSM-IV alcohol and drug use disorder criteria and diagnoses as measured by AUDADIS-ADR, CIDI and SCAN. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1997;47:195–205. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(97)00090-2. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
