MRI-based score to predict surgical difficulty in patients with rectal cancer

Br J Surg. 2018 Jan;105(1):140-146. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10642. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

Abstract

Background: Rectal cancer surgery is technically challenging and depends on many factors. This study evaluated the ability of clinical and anatomical factors to predict surgical difficulty in total mesorectal excision.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer in a laparoscopic, robotic or open procedure after neoadjuvant treatment, between 2005 and 2014, were included in this retrospective study. Preoperative clinical and MRI data were studied to develop a surgical difficulty grade.

Results: In total, 164 patients with a median age of 61 (range 26-86) years were considered to be at low risk (143, 87·2 per cent) or high risk (21, 12·8 per cent) of surgical difficulty. In multivariable analysis, BMI at least 30 kg/m2 (P = 0·021), coloanal anastomosis (versus colorectal) (P = 0·034), intertuberous distance less than 10·1 cm (P = 0·041) and mesorectal fat area exceeding 20·7 cm2 (P = 0·051) were associated with greater surgical difficulty. A four-item score (ranging from 0 to 4), with each item (BMI, type of surgery, intertuberous distance and mesorectal fat area) scored 0 (absence) or 1 (presence), is proposed. Patients can be considered at high risk of a difficult or challenging operation if they have a score of 3 or more.

Conclusion: This simple morphometric score may assist surgical decision-making and comparative study by defining operative difficulty before surgery.

Publication types

  • Observational Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Clinical Decision-Making / methods*
  • Decision Support Techniques*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Rectal Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Rectum / diagnostic imaging
  • Rectum / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies