Lingering Cognitive States Shape Fundamental Mnemonic Abilities
- PMID: 29116882
- DOI: 10.1177/0956797617728592
Lingering Cognitive States Shape Fundamental Mnemonic Abilities
Abstract
Why are people sometimes able to recall associations in exquisite detail while at other times left frustrated by the deficiencies of memory? Although this apparent fickleness of memory has been extensively studied by investigating factors that build strong memory traces, researchers know less about whether memory success also depends on cognitive states that are in place when a cue is encountered. Motivating this possibility, neurocomputational models propose that the hippocampus's capacity to support associative recollection (pattern completion) is biased by persistent neurochemical states, which can be elicited by exposure to familiarity and novelty. We investigated these models' behavioral implications by assessing how recent familiarity influences different memory-retrieval processes. We found that recent familiarity selectively benefitted associative memory (Experiment 1) and that this effect decayed over seconds (Experiment 2), consistent with the timescale of hippocampal neuromodulation. Thus, we show that basic memory computations can be shaped by a subtle, biologically motivated manipulation.
Keywords: acetylcholine; cognition; memory; novelty; open data; open materials.
Similar articles
-
Impaired assessment of cumulative lifetime familiarity for object concepts after left anterior temporal-lobe resection that includes perirhinal cortex but spares the hippocampus.Neuropsychologia. 2016 Sep;90:170-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.035. Epub 2016 Jul 1. Neuropsychologia. 2016. PMID: 27378441
-
Prefrontal and hippocampal contributions to visual associative recognition: interactions between cognitive control and episodic retrieval.Brain Cogn. 2004 Nov;56(2):141-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2003.08.001. Brain Cogn. 2004. PMID: 15518931 Clinical Trial.
-
Components of recognition memory: dissociable cognitive processes or just differences in representational complexity?Hippocampus. 2010 Nov;20(11):1245-62. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20865. Hippocampus. 2010. PMID: 20882548
-
A Roadmap for Understanding Memory: Decomposing Cognitive Processes into Operations and Representations.eNeuro. 2019 Jul 10;6(4):ENEURO.0122-19.2019. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0122-19.2019. Print 2019 Jul/Aug. eNeuro. 2019. PMID: 31189554 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How do memory systems detect and respond to novelty?Neurosci Lett. 2018 Jul 27;680:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.01.053. Epub 2018 Feb 3. Neurosci Lett. 2018. PMID: 29408218 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Preparation for upcoming attentional states in the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex.Elife. 2020 Apr 7;9:e53191. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53191. Elife. 2020. PMID: 32255423 Free PMC article.
-
Cortical Representations of Visual Stimuli Shift Locations with Changes in Memory States.Curr Biol. 2021 Mar 8;31(5):1119-1126.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.004. Epub 2021 Feb 11. Curr Biol. 2021. PMID: 33577747 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal Context Modulates Encoding and Retrieval of Overlapping Events.J Neurosci. 2022 Apr 6;42(14):3000-3010. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1091-21.2022. Epub 2022 Mar 1. J Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35232765 Free PMC article.
-
Information perseveration in recognition memory: Examining the scope of sequential dependencies.Mem Cognit. 2024 May 9. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01582-z. Online ahead of print. Mem Cognit. 2024. PMID: 38724882
-
Top-Down Task Goals Induce the Retrieval State.J Neurosci. 2024 Jul 31;44(31):e0452242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0452-24.2024. J Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38926086
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
