Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 13;12(11):e0185612.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185612. eCollection 2017.

High-throughput m6A-seq reveals RNA m6A methylation patterns in the chloroplast and mitochondria transcriptomes of Arabidopsis thaliana

Affiliations
Free PMC article

High-throughput m6A-seq reveals RNA m6A methylation patterns in the chloroplast and mitochondria transcriptomes of Arabidopsis thaliana

Zegang Wang et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

This study is the first to comprehensively characterize m6A patterns in the Arabidopsis chloroplast and mitochondria transcriptomes based on our open accessible data deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus with GEO Series accession number of GSE72706. Over 86% of the transcripts were methylated by m6A in the two organelles. Over 550 and 350 m6A sites were mapped, with ~5.6 to ~5.8 and ~4.6 to ~4.9 m6A sites per transcript, to the chloroplast and mitochondria genome, respectively. The overall m6A methylation extent in the two organelles was greatly higher than that in the nucleus. The m6A motif sequences in the transcriptome of two organelles were similar to the nuclear motifs, suggesting that selection of the m6A motifs for RNA methylation was conserved between the nucleus and organelle transcriptomes. The m6A patterns of rRNAs and tRNAs in the organelle were similar to those in the nucleus. However, the m6A patterns in coding RNAs were distinct between the nucleus and the organelle, suggesting that that regulation of the m6A methylation patterns may be different between the nuclei and the organelles. The extensively methylated transcripts in the two organelles were mainly associated with rRNA, ribosomal proteins, photosystem reaction proteins, tRNA, NADH dehydrogenase and redox. On average, 64% and 79% of the transcripts in the two organelles showed differential m6A methylation across three organs of the leaves, flowers and roots. The m6A methylation extent in the chloroplast was higher than that in the mitochondria. This study provides deep insights into the m6A methylation topology and differentiation in the plant organelle transcriptomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Screenshots from the IGV visualized program present two typical types of m6A topologies in the coding RNAs in the Arabidopsis mitochondria.
Extent of m6A methylation, sequencing depth, sequencing fragment alignment, and gene ID of the sequencing data can be clearly visualized by the IGV program [42]. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Red leftwards arrow”, presents m6A methylation extent across the transcript. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Black leftwards arrow”, presents sequencing fragment alignment across the transcript. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Black leftwards arrow with tail”, presents gene ID information including gene ID, sequence reading direction, the intron and exon regions. (a) Type 1 (representative gene, ‘ATMG00920’, expressed for ‘a hypothetical protein’), the whole transcript without intron was highly methylated by m6A; (b) Type 2 (representative gene, ‘ATMG00160’, expressed for ‘cytochrome oxidase 2’), the exon was highly methylated but the intron was not methylated by m6A. Trace files of three organs, leaves (the upper), flowers (in the middle) and roots (the lower) were presented within a screenshot.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Number of the overlapped m6A transcripts in the two m6A-seq replicates.
(a) in the leaf chloroplast; (b) in the flower chloroplast; (c) in the root amyloplast; (d)in the leaf mitochondria; (e) in the flower mitochondria; and (f) in the root mitochondria.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Features of m6A methylation in two organelles.
(a) Proportion of the transcribed methylated genes containing different m6A sites in the chloroplast/amyloplast transcriptome; (b) proportion of the transcribed methylated genes containing different m6A sites in the mitochondria transcriptome; (c) the most common consensus motif (RRm6ACH) in the m6A peaks in the chloroplast/amyloplast transcriptome; and (d) the most common consensus motif (RRm6ACH) in the m6A peaks the mitochondria transcriptome.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Screenshots from the IGV visualized program present two typical types of m6A topologies in the coding RNAs in the Arabidopsis chloroplast/amyloplast.
Extent of m6A methylation, sequencing depth, sequencing fragment alignment, and gene ID of the sequencing data can be clearly visualized by the IGV program [42]. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Red leftwards arrow”, presents m6A methylation extent across the transcript. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Black leftwards arrow”, presents sequencing fragment alignment across the transcript. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Black leftwards arrow with tail”, presents gene ID information including gene ID, sequence reading direction, the intron and exon regions. (a) Type 1 (representative gene, ‘ATCG00020’, expressed for ‘photosystem II reaction center protein A’), the whole transcript without intron was highly methylated by m6A; and (b) Type 2 (representative gene, ‘ATCG00130’, expressed for ‘ATPase, F0 complex, subunit B/B’), the exon was highly methylated but the intron was less methylated by m6A. Trace files of three organs, leaves (the upper), flowers (in the middle) and roots (the lower) were presented within a screenshot.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Screenshots from the IGV visualized program present m6A topologies in rRNA and tRNAs in the Arabidopsis chloroplast/amyloplast.
Extent of m6A methylation, sequencing depth, sequencing fragment alignment, and gene ID of the sequencing data can be clearly visualized by the IGV program [42]. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Red leftwards arrow”, presents m6A methylation extent across the transcript. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Black leftwards arrow”, presents sequencing fragment alignment across the transcript. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Black leftwards arrow with tail”, presents gene ID information including gene ID, sequence reading direction, the intron and exon regions. (a) The whole rRNA was highly methylated by m6A, representative rRNA, ‘ATCG00920’; (b) The whole tRNA with intron was highly methylated, representative tRNA, ‘ATCG00100’; and (c) The whole tRNA without intron was highly methylated, representative tRNA, ‘ATCG00110’. The Trace files of three organs, leaves (the upper), flowers (in the middle) and roots (the lower) were presented within a screenshot.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Screenshots from the IGV visualized program present m6A topologies in rRNA and tRNAs in the Arabidopsis mitochondria.
Extent of m6A methylation, sequencing depth, sequencing fragment alignment, and gene ID of the sequencing data can be clearly visualized by the IGV program [42]. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Red leftwards arrow”, presents m6A methylation extent across the transcript. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Black leftwards arrow”, presents sequencing fragment alignment across the transcript. The area in the screenshot indicated by the arrow, “Black leftwards arrow with tail”, presents gene ID information including gene ID, sequence reading direction, the intron and exon regions. (a) The whole rRNA was highly methylated by m6A, representative rRNA, ‘ATMG01390’; (b) The whole tRNA was slightly methylated by m6A, representative tRNA, ‘ATMG00380’, expressed for tRNA-Asn. The Trace files of three organs, leaves (the upper), flowers (in the middle) and roots (the lower) were presented within a screenshot.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Finkel D, and Groner Y. Methylations of adenosine residues (m6A) in pre-mRNA are important for formation of late simian virus 40 mRNAs. Virology.1983; 131:409–425. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(83)90508-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kane SE, and Beemon K. Precise localization of m6A in Rous sarcoma virus RNA reveals clustering of methylation sites: implications for RNA processing. Mol Cell Biol. 1985; 5: 2298–2306. doi: 10.1128/MCB.5.9.2298 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matera AG, Terns RM and Terns MP. Non-coding RNAs: lessons from the small nuclear and small nucleolar RNAs. Nat Rev. 2007; 8: 209–220. doi: 10.1038/nrm2124 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cantara WA, Crain PF, Rozenski J, McCloskey JA, Harris KA, Zhang X, et al. The RNA modification database, RNAMDB: 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res.2011; 39: D195–201. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Globisch D, Pearson D, Hienzsch A, Bruckl T, Wagner M, Thoma I, et al. Systems-based analysis of modified tRNA bases. AngewChemIntEd Engl. 2011; 50: 9739–9742. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103229 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources