Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 8 (50), 88021-88033

The hOCT1 and ABCB1 Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Pharmacodynamics of Nilotinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia


The hOCT1 and ABCB1 Polymorphisms Do Not Influence the Pharmacodynamics of Nilotinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Sara Galimberti et al. Oncotarget.


First-line nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia is more effective than imatinib to achieve early and deep molecular responses, despite poor tolerability or failure observed in one-third of patients. The toxicity and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors might depend on the activity of transmembrane transporters. However, the impact of transporters genes polymorphisms in nilotinib setting is still debated. We investigated the possible correlation between single nucleotide polymorphisms of hOCT1 (rs683369 [c.480C>G]) and ABCB1 (rs1128503 [c.1236C>T], rs2032582 [c.2677G>T/A], rs1045642 [c.3435C>T]) and nilotinib efficacy and toxicity in a cohort of 78 patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia in the context of current clinical practice. The early molecular response was achieved by 81% of patients while 64% of them attained deep molecular response (median time, 26 months). The 36-month event-free survival was 86%, whereas 58% of patients experienced toxicities. Interestingly, hOCT1 and ABCB1 polymorphisms alone or in combination did not influence event-free survival or the adverse events rate. Therefore, in contrast to data obtained in patients treated with imatinib, hOCT1 and ABCB1 polymorphisms do not impact on nilotinib efficacy or toxicity. This could be relevant in the choice of the first-line therapy: patients with polymorphisms that negatively condition imatinib efficacy might thus receive nilotinib as first-line therapy.

Keywords: ABC transporters; ABCB1; early molecular response; hOCT1; nilotinib.

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST SG, ADP, AI, GS, GRC, MP, CF participated to advisory boards sponsored by Novartis. Nevertheless, all authors declare no conflicts of interest concern this spontaneous, not industry-sponsored study.


Figure 1
Figure 1
The probability of event-free survival (EFS) of the whole series according to the achievement of early molecular response (EMR, (A)) and deep molecular response (DMR, (B)).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The probability of event-free survival (EFS) according to the ABCB1 polymorphisms (panels A and B) and the hOCT1 polymorphism (panel C).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 articles


    1. Castagnetti F, Di Raimondo F, De Vivo A, Spitaleri A, Gugliotta G, Fabbiano F, Capodanno I, Mannina D, Salvucci M, Antolino A, Marasca R, Musso M, Crugnola M, et al. A population-based study of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib in first line. Am J Hematol. 2017;92:82–7. - PubMed
    1. Kantarjian HM, Hochhaus A, Saglio G, De Souza C, Flinn IW, Stenke L, Goh YT, Rosti G, Nakamae H, Gallagher NJ, Hoenekopp A, Blakesley RE, Larson RA, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase, Philadelphia chromosome-positive, chronic myeloid leukaemia: 24-month minimum follow-up of the phase 3 randomised ENESTnd trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:841–51. - PubMed
    1. O’Hare T, Walters DK, Deininger MW, Druker BJ. AMN107: tightening the grip of imatinib. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:117–9. - PubMed
    1. Hochhaus A, Saglio G, Hughes TP, Larson RA, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre PD, Etienne G, Dorlhiac-Llacer PE, Clark RE, Flinn IW, Nakamae H, Donohue B, et al. Long-term benefits and risks of frontline nilotinib vs imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 5-year update of the randomized ENESTnd trial. Leukemia. 2016;30:1044–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soverini S, De Benedittis C, Polakova KM, Linhartova J, Castagnetti F, Gugliotta G, Papayannidis C, Mancini M, Klamova H, Salvucci M, Crugnola M, Iurlo A, Albano F, et al. Next-generation sequencing for sensitive detection of BCR-ABL1 mutations relevant to tyrosine kinase inhibitor choice in imatinib-resistant patients. Oncotarget. 2016;7:21982–90. - DOI - PMC - PubMed