Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Feb;66(2):263-273.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.15173. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

Community Program Improves Quality of Life and Self-Management in Older Adults With Diabetes Mellitus and Comorbidity

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Community Program Improves Quality of Life and Self-Management in Older Adults With Diabetes Mellitus and Comorbidity

Maureen Markle-Reid et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the effect of a 6-month community-based intervention with that of usual care on quality of life, depressive symptoms, anxiety, self-efficacy, self-management, and healthcare costs in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and 2 or more comorbidities.

Design: Multisite, single-blind, parallel, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Four communities in Ontario, Canada.

Participants: Community-dwelling older adults (≥65) with T2DM and 2 or more comorbidities randomized into intervention (n = 80) and control (n = 79) groups (N = 159).

Intervention: Client-driven, customized self-management program with up to 3 in-home visits from a registered nurse or registered dietitian, a monthly group wellness program, monthly provider team case conferences, and care coordination and system navigation.

Measurements: Quality-of-life measures included the Physical Component Summary (PCS, primary outcome) and Mental Component Summary (MCS, secondary outcome) scores of the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Other secondary outcome measures were the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10), Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease, and healthcare costs.

Results: Morbidity burden was high (average of eight comorbidities). Intention-to-treat analyses using analysis of covariance showed a group difference favoring the intervention for the MCS (mean difference = 2.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28-5.09, P = .03), SDSCA (mean difference = 3.79, 95% CI = 1.02-6.56, P = .01), and CES-D-10 (mean difference = -1.45, 95% CI = -0.13 to -2.76, P = .03). No group differences were seen in PCS score, anxiety, self-efficacy, or total healthcare costs.

Conclusion: Participation in a 6-month community-based intervention improved quality of life and self-management and reduced depressive symptoms in older adults with T2DM and comorbidity without increasing total healthcare costs.

Keywords: community-based program; comorbidity; older adults; self-management; type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean difference in older adults’ quality of life as measured according to physical functioning (Medical Outcomes Study 12‐item Short‐Form Survey (SF‐12) Physical Component Summary (PCS)) and mental functioning (SF‐12 Mental Component Summary (MCS)) scores from baseline to 6 months for 5 subgroups (age, sex, number of chronic conditions, self‐efficacy, diabetes duration).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 7 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Diabetes Fact Sheet . World Health Organization Media Centre [on‐line]. Available at www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/en/ Accessed March 3, 2017.
    1. World Health Organization . Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications: Report of a WHO Consultation. Part 1, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. World Health Organization Department of Noncommunicable Disease Surveillance, 1999. [on‐line]. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66040 Accessed March 3, 2017.
    1. Kirkman M, Briscoe VJ, Clark N et al. Diabetes in older adults: A consensus report. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60:2342–2356. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinnige J, Braspenning J, Schellevis F et al. The prevalence of disease clusters in older adults with multiple chronic diseases: A systematic literature review. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e79641. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Willi C, Bodenmann P, Ghali WA et al. Active smoking and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA 2007;298:2654–2664. - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback