Effect of Several Negative Rounds of Human Papillomavirus and Cytology Co-testing on Safety Against Cervical Cancer: An Observational Cohort Study
- PMID: 29181509
- DOI: 10.7326/M17-1609
Effect of Several Negative Rounds of Human Papillomavirus and Cytology Co-testing on Safety Against Cervical Cancer: An Observational Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Current U.S. cervical cancer screening and management guidelines do not consider previous screening history, because data on multiple-round human papillomavirus (HPV) and cytology "co-testing" have been unavailable.
Objective: To measure cervical cancer risk in routine practice after successive negative screening co-tests at 3-year intervals.
Design: Observational cohort study.
Setting: Integrated health care system (Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California).
Patients: 990 013 women who had 1 or more co-tests from 2003 to 2014.
Measurements: 3- and 5-year cumulative detection of (risk for) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, adenocarcinoma in situ, and cervical cancer (≥CIN3) in women with different numbers of negative co-tests, overall and within subgroups defined by previous co-test results or baseline age.
Results: Five-year ≥CIN3 risks decreased after each successive negative co-test screening round (0.098%, 0.052%, and 0.035%). Five-year ≥CIN3 risks for an HPV-negative co-test, regardless of the cytology result, nearly matched the performance (reassurance) of a negative co-test for each successive round of screening (0.114%, 0.061%, and 0.041%). By comparison, ≥CIN3 risks for the cytology-negative co-test, regardless of the HPV result, also decreased with each successive round, but 3-year risks were as high as 5-year risks after an HPV-negative co-test (0.199%, 0.065%, and 0.043%). No interval cervical cancer cases were diagnosed after the second negative co-test. Independently, ≥CIN3 risks decreased with age. Length of previous screening interval did not influence future ≥CIN3 risks.
Limitation: Interval-censored observational data.
Conclusion: After 1 or more negative cervical co-tests (or HPV tests), longer screening intervals (every 5 years or more) might be feasible and safe.
Primary funding source: National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program.
Comment in
-
Cervical Cancer Screening: The Transformational Role of Routine Human Papillomavirus Testing.Ann Intern Med. 2018 Jan 2;168(1):75-76. doi: 10.7326/M17-2872. Epub 2017 Nov 28. Ann Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29181508 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.Health Technol Assess. 2014 Apr;18(23):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta18230. Health Technol Assess. 2014. PMID: 24762804 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A study of the risks of CIN3+ detection after multiple rounds of HPV testing: Results of the 15-year cervical cancer screening experience at Kaiser Permanente Northern California.Int J Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;147(6):1612-1620. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32950. Epub 2020 Mar 26. Int J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32141607
-
Cervical cancer risk for women undergoing concurrent testing for human papillomavirus and cervical cytology: a population-based study in routine clinical practice.Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):663-72. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70145-0. Epub 2011 Jun 16. Lancet Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21684207 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for Cervical Cancer With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Aug. Report No.: 17-05231-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Aug. Report No.: 17-05231-EF-1. PMID: 30256575 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing to screen for cervical cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):687-97, W214-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00376. Epub 2011 Oct 17. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22006930 Review.
Cited by
-
Emerging trends and hotspots in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia research from 2013 to 2023: A bibliometric analysis.Heliyon. 2024 May 29;10(11):e32114. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32114. eCollection 2024 Jun 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38882369 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence of Decreased Long-term Risk of Cervical Precancer after Negative Primary HPV Screens Compared with Negative Cytology Screens in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Jul 1;33(7):904-911. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1587. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024. PMID: 38773687
-
Current status and challenges in timely detection of cervical cancer in Mexico: expert consensus.Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 28;14:1383105. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1383105. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38606102 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and determining the follow-up period in high-risk human papillomavirus patients.Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 17;13:1289030. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1289030. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38298438 Free PMC article.
-
Validation in Zambia of a cervical screening strategy including HPV genotyping and artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated visual evaluation.Infect Agent Cancer. 2023 Oct 16;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13027-023-00536-5. Infect Agent Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37845724 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical