Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 1;25(4):440-446.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx140.

Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study

Affiliations

Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study

Traber D Giardina et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: Online portals provide patients with access to their test results, but it is unknown how patients use these tools to manage results and what information is available to promote understanding. We conducted a mixed-methods study to explore patients' experiences and preferences when accessing their test results via portals.

Materials and methods: We conducted 95 interviews (13 semistructured and 82 structured) with adults who viewed a test result in their portal between April 2015 and September 2016 at 4 large outpatient clinics in Houston, Texas. Semistructured interviews were coded using content analysis and transformed into quantitative data and integrated with the structured interview data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the structured data.

Results: Nearly two-thirds (63%) did not receive any explanatory information or test result interpretation at the time they received the result, and 46% conducted online searches for further information about their result. Patients who received an abnormal result were more likely to experience negative emotions (56% vs 21%; P = .003) and more likely to call their physician (44% vs 15%; P = .002) compared with those who received normal results.

Discussion: Study findings suggest that online portals are not currently designed to present test results to patients in a meaningful way. Patients experienced negative emotions often with abnormal results, but sometimes even with normal results. Simply providing access via portals is insufficient; additional strategies are needed to help patients interpret and manage their online test results.

Conclusion: Given the absence of national guidance, our findings could help strengthen policy and practice in this area and inform innovations that promote patient understanding of test results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Hospital Association. Individuals’ Ability to Electronically Access Their Hospital Medical Records, Perform Key Tasks [Internet]. www.aha.org/research/reports/tw/16jul-tw-healthIT pdf. 2016. Accessed March 20, 2017.
    1. US Government Accountability Office. Health Information Technology: HHS Should Assess the Effectiveness of Its Efforts to Enhance Patient Access to and Use of Electronic Health Information (GAO-17-305). Washington, DC; 2017. Accessed March 20, 2017.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CLIA program and HIPAA privacy rule; patients’ access to test reports (42 CFR 493, 45 CFR 164). Fed Reg. 2011;76178.
    1. Health Information Technology: Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology, 2014 Edition; Revisions to the Permanent Certification Program for Health Information Technology. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Department of Health and Human Services. Fed Reg. 2012;77:13845 www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03-07/pdf/2012-4430.pdf. Accessed January 18, 2017. - PubMed
    1. Baldwin DM, Quintela J, Duclos C, Staton EW, Pace WD. Patient preferences for notification of normal laboratory test results: a report from the ASIPS Collaborative. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;61:11. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types