Experimental Models Used to Assess Lymphatic Contractile Function

Lymphat Res Biol. 2017 Dec;15(4):331-342. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0052.

Abstract

Recent years have seen a renewed interest in studies of the lymphatic system. This review addresses the differences between in vivo and ex vivo methods for visualization and functional studies of lymphatic networks, with an emphasis on studies of collecting lymphatic vessels. We begin with a brief summary of the historical uses of both approaches. For the purpose of detailed comparisons, we subdivide in vivo methods into those visualizing lymphatic networks through the intact skin and those using surgically opened skin. We subdivide ex vivo methods into isobaric studies (using a pressure myograph) or isometric studies (using a wire myograph). For all four categories, we compile a comprehensive list of the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of each preparation, with the goal of informing the research community as to the appropriate kinds of experiments best suited, and ill suited, for each.

Keywords: NIRF; imaging; intravital; pressure.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biomarkers
  • Humans
  • Lymphatic Vessels / physiology*
  • Lymphatic Vessels / physiopathology
  • Microscopy / methods
  • Models, Theoretical*
  • Muscle Contraction*
  • Muscle, Smooth, Vascular / physiology*
  • Muscle, Smooth, Vascular / physiopathology
  • Vasoconstriction*

Substances

  • Biomarkers