Purpose: To determine the retinal eccentricity at which cones are no longer an observable substitute for ganglion cells on nasal and inferior parafoveal visual acuity.
Method: Visual acuities were measured on 12 healthy volunteers, under dynamic adaptive optic aberrations correction (crx1™) in white light, from 0° to 6°, every two degrees, along the nasal and inferior retinal meridians. Cone spacing was measured on images of the retina acquired using an adaptive optic flood illumination retina camera (rtx1™) at the same eccentricity, except at 0°.
Results: Cone spacing increased by around 0.13 min of arc per degree of eccentricity and a difference of 7% between both meridians was observed (higher cone spacing in the inferior retinal meridian). Visual resolution was higher in the nasal retinal meridian (difference of around 28% or 0.15 logMAR at 6°). Cone spacing can predict minimum angle of resolution (MAR) at 2° in both semi retinal meridians. In the inferior retinal meridian, MAR measurements are fairly well predicted by Watson's 50% mathematical model based on the midget retinal ganglion cell density. Along the nasal retinal meridian, the measured MAR lies between Watson's 50% and 100% models.
Conclusions: At 2° of eccentricity, cone density accurately predicts visual resolution in both the nasal and inferior retina, supporting the idea that only 50% of the foveal midget retinal ganglion cells determine VA. The 50% model can also predict VA in the inferior retinal meridian at 4° and 6° of eccentricity. However, the 50% model underestimated visual acuity in the nasal retinal meridian at 4° and 6° of eccentricity consistent with the partially overlapping ON and OFF midget retinal ganglion cell receptive fields.
Keywords: cone spacing; midget retinal ganglion cells; parafoveal visual resolution.
© 2017 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2017 The College of Optometrists.