Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec 18:3:23.
doi: 10.1186/s40748-017-0062-0. eCollection 2017.

NEC-zero recommendations from scoping review of evidence to prevent and foster timely recognition of necrotizing enterocolitis

Sheila M Gephart  1 , Corrine Hanson  2 , Christine M Wetzel  3 , Michelle Fleiner  4 , Erin Umberger  5 , Laura Martin  6 , Suma Rao  7   8   9 , Amit Agrawal  10   11 , Terri Marin  12 , Khaver Kirmani  4   8 , Megan Quinn  1   4 , Jenny Quinn  1   13 , Katherine M Dudding  1 , Tanya Clay  14 , Jason Sauberan  15 , Yael Eskenazi  1 , Caroline Porter  1 , Amy L Msowoya  16 , Christina Wyles  1 , Melissa Avenado-Ruiz  17 , Shayla Vo  1 , Kristina M Reber  18 , Jennifer Duchon  19
Affiliations
Review

NEC-zero recommendations from scoping review of evidence to prevent and foster timely recognition of necrotizing enterocolitis

Sheila M Gephart et al. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. .

Abstract

Background: Although decades have focused on unraveling its etiology, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains a chief threat to the health of premature infants. Both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors contribute to varying rates of disease across neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present a scoping review with two new meta-analyses, clinical recommendations, and implementation strategies to prevent and foster timely recognition of NEC.

Methods: Using the Translating Research into Practice (TRIP) framework, we conducted a stakeholder-engaged scoping review to classify strength of evidence and form implementation recommendations using GRADE criteria across subgroup areas: 1) promoting human milk, 2) feeding protocols and transfusion, 3) timely recognition strategies, and 4) medication stewardship. Sub-groups answered 5 key questions, reviewed 11 position statements and 71 research reports. Meta-analyses with random effects were conducted on effects of standardized feeding protocols and donor human milk derived fortifiers on NEC.

Results: Quality of evidence ranged from very low (timely recognition) to moderate (feeding protocols, prioritize human milk, limiting antibiotics and antacids). Prioritizing human milk, feeding protocols and avoiding antacids were strongly recommended. Weak recommendations (i.e. "probably do it") for limiting antibiotics and use of a standard timely recognition approach are presented. Meta-analysis of data from infants weighing <1250 g fed donor human milk based fortifier had reduced odds of NEC compared to those fed cow's milk based fortifier (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.13, 1.00; p = 0.05; 4 studies, N = 1164). Use of standardized feeding protocols for infants <1500 g reduced odds of NEC by 67% (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.17, 0.65, p = 0.001; 9 studies; N = 4755 infants). Parents recommended that NEC information be shared early in the NICU stay, when feedings were adjusted, or feeding intolerance occurred via print and video materials to supplement verbal instruction.

Discussion: Evidence for NEC prevention is of sufficient quality to implement. Implementation that addresses system-level interventions that engage the whole team, including parents, will yield the best impact to prevent NEC and foster its timely recognition.

Keywords: Clinical practice guideline; Evidence-based practice; Infant; NEC-zero; Necrotizing enterocolitis; Neonatal intensive care; Nursing; Parent engagement; Practice guidelines; Prevention; Scoping review; Translating Research into Practice Framework; Very low birth weight.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This project was deemed not research. Results present a review with expert assessment of recommendations and implementation strategies. All experts participated without coersion.All authors give consent for publication and assure that the paper is not in review by another journal nor have they been published before.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Translating research into practice framework adapted for NEC-Zero
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pooled effects of donor human milk-based fortifier compared to cow’s milk-based fortifier on odds of NEC
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pooled effects of standardized feeding protocol on odds of NEC
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Russell RB, Green NS, Steiner CA, et al. Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States. Pediatrics. 2007;120(1):e1–e9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2386. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schulman J, Stricof RL, Stevens TP, et al. Development of a statewide collaborative to decrease NICU central line-associated bloodstream infections. J Perinatol. 2009;29(9):591–599. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.18. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suresh GK, Edwards WH. Central line-associated bloodstream infections in neonatal intensive care: changing the mental model from inevitability to preventability. Am J Perinatol. 2012;29(1):57–64. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1286182. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yee WH, Soraisham AS, Shah VS, Aziz K, Yoon W, Lee SK. Incidence and Timing of Presentation of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics. 2012;129(2):e298–e304. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fanaroff AA, Stoll BJ, Wright LL, et al. Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(2) doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.014. - PubMed