Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Dec 22:359:j5542.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5542.

Incremental effects of antihypertensive drugs: instrumental variable analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Incremental effects of antihypertensive drugs: instrumental variable analysis

Adam A Markovitz et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the incremental effects of adding extra antihypertensive drugs from a new class to a patient's regimen.

Design: Instrumental variable analysis of data from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). To account for confounding by indication-when treatments seem less effective if they are administered to sicker patients-randomization status was used as the instrumental variable. Patients' randomization status was either intensive (systolic blood pressure target <120 mm Hg) or standard (systolic blood pressure target <140 mm Hg) treatment. Results from instrumental variable models were compared with those from standard multivariable models.

Setting: Secondary data analysis of a randomized clinical trial conducted at 102 sites in 2010-15.

Participants: 9092 SPRINT participants with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk but no history of diabetes or stroke.

Main outcomes measures: Systolic blood pressure, major cardiovascular events, and serious adverse events.

Results: In standard multivariable models not adjusted for confounding by indication, addition of an antihypertensive drug from a new class was associated with modestly lower systolic blood pressure (-1.3 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval -1.6 to -1.0) and no change in major cardiovascular events (absolute risk of events per 1000 patient years, 0.5, 95% confidence interval -1.5 to 2.3). In instrumental variable models, the addition of an antihypertensive drug from a new class led to clinically important reductions in systolic blood pressure (-14.4 mm Hg, -15.6 to -13.3) and fewer major cardiovascular events (absolute risk -6.2, -10.9 to -1.3). Incremental reductions in systolic blood pressure remained large and similar in magnitude for patients already taking drugs from zero, one, two, or three or more drug classes. This finding was consistent across all subgroups of patients. The addition of another antihypertensive drug class was not associated with adverse events in either standard or instrumental variable models.

Conclusions: After adjustment for confounding by indication, the addition of a new antihypertensive drug class led to large reductions in systolic blood pressure and major cardiovascular events among patients at high risk for cardiovascular events but without diabetes. Effects on systolic blood pressure persisted across all levels of baseline drug use and all subgroups of patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: BKN receives support from the American Heart Association for his role as editor in chief of Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes and has previously served on the scientific cardiac advisory board for United Healthcare; no support from any organization for the submitted work;no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Incremental effects of antihypertensive drug classes on systolic blood pressure. Diamonds represent point estimates from pooled models. Squares represent point estimates from models stratified by baseline number of drug classes. Systolic blood pressure was each patient’s final recorded measurement. Antihypertensive drug classes are measured at baseline and at latest visit for which there was also recorded measurement of blood pressure. Multivariable adjusted models estimated with ordinary least squares regression. Instrumental variable models were estimated with two stage ordinary least squares regression
Fig 2
Fig 2
Incremental effects of antihypertensive drug classes on major cardiovascular events. Diamonds represent point estimates from pooled models. Squares represent point estimates from models stratified by baseline number of drug classes. Major cardiovascular events defined as composite including myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome not resulting in myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Antihypertensive drug classes measured at baseline and at each patient’s final visit. To minimize reverse causality, last recorded value of drug classes before incidence of event was used for patients who experienced a major cardiovascular event. For standard multivariable models, additive hazards models estimated to account for right censored nature of survival outcomes. For instrumental variable models, recently validated two stage approach was implemented, substituting predicted number of drug classes from first stage (function of randomization status and covariates) into additive hazards model
Fig 3
Fig 3
Incremental effects of antihypertensive drug classes on serious adverse events. Diamonds represent point estimates from pooled models. Squares represent point estimates from models stratified by baseline number of drug classes. Serious adverse events defined as composite including emergency department evaluations for hypotension, syncope, bradycardia, electrolyte imbalance, injurious fall, or admissions for acute kidney injury or acute renal failure. Antihypertensive drug classes measured at baseline and at each patient’s final visit. To minimize reverse causality, last recorded value of drug classes before incidence of event was used for those patient who experienced serious adverse event. For standard multivariable models, additive hazards models were estimated to account for right censored nature of survival outcomes. For instrumental variable models, recently validated two stage approach was implmented, substituting predicted number of drug classes from first stage (function of randomization status and covariates) into additive hazards model

Comment in

  • From the Editor.
    Levy D. Levy D. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2018 Mar;12(3):147. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 6. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2018. PMID: 29434009 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, et al. Global Burden of Hypertension and Systolic Blood Pressure of at Least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990-2015. JAMA 2017;317:165-82. 10.1001/jama.2016.19043 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gu Q, Burt VL, Dillon CF, Yoon S. Trends in antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control among United States adults with hypertension: the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001 to 2010. Circulation 2012;126:2105-14. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.096156 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rana BK, Dhamija A, Panizzon MS, et al. Imputing observed blood pressure for antihypertensive treatment: impact on population and genetic analyses. Am J Hypertens 2014;27:828-37. 10.1093/ajh/hpt271 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Timbie JW, Hayward RA, Vijan S. Variation in the net benefit of aggressive cardiovascular risk factor control across the US population of patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1037-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585069. 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.150 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Timbie JW, Hayward RA, Vijan S. Diminishing efficacy of combination therapy, response-heterogeneity, and treatment intolerance limit the attainability of tight risk factor control in patients with diabetes. Health Serv Res 2010;45:437-56. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01075.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources