Incremental effects of antihypertensive drugs: instrumental variable analysis
- PMID: 29273586
- PMCID: PMC5736968
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j5542
Incremental effects of antihypertensive drugs: instrumental variable analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the incremental effects of adding extra antihypertensive drugs from a new class to a patient's regimen.
Design: Instrumental variable analysis of data from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). To account for confounding by indication-when treatments seem less effective if they are administered to sicker patients-randomization status was used as the instrumental variable. Patients' randomization status was either intensive (systolic blood pressure target <120 mm Hg) or standard (systolic blood pressure target <140 mm Hg) treatment. Results from instrumental variable models were compared with those from standard multivariable models.
Setting: Secondary data analysis of a randomized clinical trial conducted at 102 sites in 2010-15.
Participants: 9092 SPRINT participants with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk but no history of diabetes or stroke.
Main outcomes measures: Systolic blood pressure, major cardiovascular events, and serious adverse events.
Results: In standard multivariable models not adjusted for confounding by indication, addition of an antihypertensive drug from a new class was associated with modestly lower systolic blood pressure (-1.3 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval -1.6 to -1.0) and no change in major cardiovascular events (absolute risk of events per 1000 patient years, 0.5, 95% confidence interval -1.5 to 2.3). In instrumental variable models, the addition of an antihypertensive drug from a new class led to clinically important reductions in systolic blood pressure (-14.4 mm Hg, -15.6 to -13.3) and fewer major cardiovascular events (absolute risk -6.2, -10.9 to -1.3). Incremental reductions in systolic blood pressure remained large and similar in magnitude for patients already taking drugs from zero, one, two, or three or more drug classes. This finding was consistent across all subgroups of patients. The addition of another antihypertensive drug class was not associated with adverse events in either standard or instrumental variable models.
Conclusions: After adjustment for confounding by indication, the addition of a new antihypertensive drug class led to large reductions in systolic blood pressure and major cardiovascular events among patients at high risk for cardiovascular events but without diabetes. Effects on systolic blood pressure persisted across all levels of baseline drug use and all subgroups of patients.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: BKN receives support from the American Heart Association for his role as editor in chief of Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality & Outcomes and has previously served on the scientific cardiac advisory board for United Healthcare; no support from any organization for the submitted work;no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
Comment in
-
From the Editor.J Am Soc Hypertens. 2018 Mar;12(3):147. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 6. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2018. PMID: 29434009 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Risk of Harm Associated With Intensive Blood Pressure Management Among Patients With Hypertension Who Smoke: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190005. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0005. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 30848803 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Personalizing the Intensity of Blood Pressure Control: Modeling the Heterogeneity of Risks and Benefits From SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Apr;10(4):e003624. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003624. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017. PMID: 28373269 Free PMC article.
-
Diastolic Hypotension May Attenuate Benefits from Intensive Systolic Targets: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Am J Med. 2018 Oct;131(10):1228-1233.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 12. Am J Med. 2018. PMID: 29906425 Clinical Trial.
-
Cochrane in context: pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):581-3. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1975. Evid Based Child Health. 2014. PMID: 25236306 Review.
-
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974. Evid Based Child Health. 2014. PMID: 25236305 Review.
Cited by
-
Antihypertensive drug concentration measurement combined with personalized feedback in resistant hypertension: a randomized controlled trial.J Hypertens. 2024 Jan 1;42(1):169-178. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003585. Epub 2023 Oct 18. J Hypertens. 2024. PMID: 37796233 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in high risk pregnancy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Respir Res. 2023 Jun 27;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02445-y. Respir Res. 2023. PMID: 37370135 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Adherence to Triple Single-Pill Combination of Perindopril/Indapamide/Amlodipine: Findings from Real-World Analysis in Italy.Adv Ther. 2023 Apr;40(4):1765-1772. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02451-y. Epub 2023 Feb 24. Adv Ther. 2023. PMID: 36829102 Free PMC article.
-
PTML modeling for peptide discovery: in silico design of non-hemolytic peptides with antihypertensive activity.Mol Divers. 2022 Oct;26(5):2523-2534. doi: 10.1007/s11030-021-10350-z. Epub 2021 Nov 21. Mol Divers. 2022. PMID: 34802116
-
Vasodilation Elicited by Isoxsuprine, Identified by High-Throughput Virtual Screening of Compound Libraries, Involves Activation of the NO/cGMP and H₂S/KATP Pathways and Blockade of α₁-Adrenoceptors and Calcium Channels.Molecules. 2019 Mar 11;24(5):987. doi: 10.3390/molecules24050987. Molecules. 2019. PMID: 30862086 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Timbie JW, Hayward RA, Vijan S. Variation in the net benefit of aggressive cardiovascular risk factor control across the US population of patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1037-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585069. 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.150 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical