Effects of the truth FinishIt brand on tobacco outcomes
- PMID: 29276667
- PMCID: PMC5724797
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.11.008
Effects of the truth FinishIt brand on tobacco outcomes
Abstract
Since 2000, the truth campaign has grown as a social marketing brand. Back then, truth employed branding to compete directly with the tobacco industry. In 2014, the launch of truth FinishIt reflected changes in the brand's strategy, the tobacco control environment, and youth/young adult behavior. Building on a previous validation study, the current study examined brand equity in truth FinishIt, as measured by validated multi-dimensional scales, and tobacco related attitudes, beliefs, and behavior based on two waves of the Truth Longitudinal Cohort data from 2015 and 2016. A fixed effects logistic regression was used to estimate the change in brand equity between panel survey waves 3 and 4 on past 30-day smoking among ever and current smokers. Additional models determined the effects of brand equity predicting tobacco attitudes/use at follow up among the full sample. All analyses controlled for demographic factors. A one-point increase in the brand equity scale between the two waves was associated with a 66% greater chance of not smoking among ever smokers (OR 1.66, CI 1.11-2.48, p < 0.05) and an 80% greater chance of not smoking among current smokers (OR 1.80, CI 1.05-3.10, p < 0.05). Higher overall truth brand equity at wave 3 predicted less smoking at wave 4 and more positive anti-tobacco attitudes. Being male, younger, and non-white predicted some of the tobacco related attitudes. Future research should examine long-term effects of brand equity on tobacco use and how tobacco control can optimize the use of branding in campaigns.
Keywords: Branding; Prevention; Smoking; Social marketing; Tobacco.
Similar articles
-
Effects of branded health messages on e-cigarette attitudes, intentions, and behaviors: a longitudinal study among youth and young adults.BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 15;21(1):1144. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11092-1. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34130636 Free PMC article.
-
Design and Feasibility Testing of the truth FinishIt Tobacco Countermarketing Brand Equity Scale.J Health Commun. 2016 Jul;21(7):800-8. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1157658. Epub 2016 Jun 17. J Health Commun. 2016. PMID: 27315354 Clinical Trial.
-
The Effect of Branding to Promote Healthy Behavior: Reducing Tobacco Use among Youth and Young Adults.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 7;14(12):1517. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121517. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017. PMID: 29215555 Free PMC article.
-
The Australian cigarette brand as product, person, and symbol.Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):iii79-86. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_3.iii79. Tob Control. 2003. PMID: 14645952 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of tobacco advertising and promotion on increasing adolescent smoking behaviours.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD003439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003439. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. PMID: 14583977 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Weight Stigma and Social Media: Evidence and Public Health Solutions.Front Nutr. 2021 Nov 12;8:739056. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.739056. eCollection 2021. Front Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34869519 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of branded health messages on e-cigarette attitudes, intentions, and behaviors: a longitudinal study among youth and young adults.BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 15;21(1):1144. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11092-1. BMC Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34130636 Free PMC article.
-
The Lung Health Ambassador Program: A Community-Engagement Initiative Focusing on Pulmonary-Related Health Issues and Disparities Regarding Tobacco Use.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 22;18(1):5. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010005. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33374951 Free PMC article.
-
Peer-to-Peer Social Media as an Effective Prevention Strategy: Quasi-Experimental Evaluation.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 6;8(5):e16207. doi: 10.2196/16207. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32374270 Free PMC article.
-
Review of Evaluation Metrics Used in Digital and Traditional Tobacco Control Campaigns.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e17432. doi: 10.2196/17432. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32348272 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Allen J.A., Vallone D., Vargyas E., Healton C. 2009. The Truth Campaign: Using Counter Marketing to Reduce Youth Smoking. The New World of Health Promotion, New Program Development, Implementation and Evaluation; pp. 195–215.
-
- Basu A., Wang J. The role of branding in public health campaigns. J. Commun. Manag. 2009;13(1):77–91.
-
- Cantrell J., Hair E.C., Smith A. Recruiting and retaining youth and young adults: challenges and opportunities in survey research for tobacco control. Tob. Control. 2017 - PubMed
-
- Eisinga R., Te Grotenhuis M., Pelzer B. The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? Int. J. Public Health. 2013;58(4):637–642. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
