High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized controlled study
- PMID: 29276865
- DOI: 10.24953/turkjped.2017.02.004
High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized controlled study
Abstract
El-Nawawy A, Moustafa A, Heshmat H, Abouahmed A. High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized controlled study. Turk J Pediatr 2017; 59: 130-143. The aim of this prospective randomized study is to compare the outcomes of the early use of either high frequency oscillation (HFO) or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). We allocated two hundred PARDS patients over 5 years in 1:1 ratio to either mode. The HFO group showed a significantly higher median partial arterial oxygen pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) values after 24 hours of enrollment (p=0.011), higher oxygenation index (OI) decrease percent (p=0.004) and lower cross-over rates (p < 0.001), whereas no differences in 30-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) or ventilation days (p=0.77, p=0.28, p=0.65 respectively). The second day values (after 24 hours) of both OI and PaO < sub > 2 < /sub > /FiO < sub > 2 < /sub > were found to be more significant discriminators for mortality when compared to the baseline values (cutoff values > 8.5, ≤139 respectively). PARDS patients with baseline OI > 16 had a better chance of survival if initially ventilated with the HFO (p=0.004). Although the HFO mode appeared to be a safe mode with a significant better oxygenation improvement (after the first 24 hours) and fewer cross-over rates, it failed to show differences as regards mortality or LOS when compared to the CMV adopting protective lung strategy. In PARDS, HFO had a superior advantage in improving oxygenation, yet with no significant mortality improvement, as multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) was the most common cause of death in our study and not refractory hypoxemia which is the main problem in PARDS; highlighting that mortality in PARDS is multi-factorial and may not depend only on how fast oxygenation improves.
Keywords: conventional mechanical ventilation; high frequency oscillation; outcome; pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome; randomized.
Similar articles
-
Improved oxygenation 24 hours after transition to airway pressure release ventilation or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation accurately discriminates survival in immunocompromised pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome*.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 May;15(4):e147-56. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000069. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24413319 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective, randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure.Crit Care Med. 1994 Oct;22(10):1530-9. Crit Care Med. 1994. PMID: 7924362 Clinical Trial.
-
High-frequency ventilation versus conventional ventilation for treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;(2):CD004085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004085.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23450549 Updated. Review.
-
The effect of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation combined with tracheal gas insufflation on extravascular lung water in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, crossover, physiologic study.J Crit Care. 2014 Aug;29(4):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.020. Epub 2014 Apr 2. J Crit Care. 2014. PMID: 24814973 Clinical Trial.
-
Acute effects of combined high-frequency oscillation and tracheal gas insufflation in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):1500-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000265738.80832.BE. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 17440419 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021.J Intensive Care. 2022 Jul 8;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40560-022-00615-6. J Intensive Care. 2022. PMID: 35799288 Free PMC article.
-
The Physiological Basis of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Current Evidence in Adults and Children: A Narrative Review.Front Physiol. 2022 Apr 26;13:813478. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.813478. eCollection 2022. Front Physiol. 2022. PMID: 35557962 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Paediatrics: how to manage acute respiratory distress syndrome.Drugs Context. 2021 Jun 1;10:2021-1-9. doi: 10.7573/dic.2021-1-9. eCollection 2021. Drugs Context. 2021. PMID: 34122589 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Current State of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2019 Jun 1;32(2):35-44. doi: 10.1089/ped.2019.0999. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2019. PMID: 31236307 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical