Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
, 37 (4), 643-649

Usefulness of a Single-Assay Chemiluminescence Test (Tularaemia VIRCLIA IgG + IgM Monotest) for the Diagnosis of Human Tularemia. Comparison of Five Serological Tests

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Usefulness of a Single-Assay Chemiluminescence Test (Tularaemia VIRCLIA IgG + IgM Monotest) for the Diagnosis of Human Tularemia. Comparison of Five Serological Tests

África Cubero et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis.

Abstract

The aim of this work was to ascertain the usefulness of a new commercially-available single-assay chemiluminescence test (CHT) for the diagnosis of human tularemia (Tularaemia VIRCLIA IgG + IgM monotest, Vircell, Santa Fe, Granada, Spain). A total of 773 sera from 773 patients including 364 initial sera from patients with diagnosed tularemia, patients with suspected tularemia not confirmed (100), healthy people (152), patients with serology positive to Brucella (97), patients diagnosed with other infectious diseases (30), and patients diagnosed with autoimmune diseases (30) were included. All sera were tested by CHT, "in-house" microagglutination test (MAT), immunochromatographic test (ICT) (Virapid Tularaemia, Vircell, Santa Fe Granada, Spain), and "in-house" ELISA IgG, and ELISA IgM. Of the total initial sera, 334 (sensitivity 91.8%) were positive in the CHT, 332 (sensitivity 91.2%) in the MAT, 330 (sensitivity 90.7%) in the ICT, and 328 (sensitivity 90.1%) in the ELISA IgG and ELISA IgM tests. The specificity of the CHT was 96.7%; of the MAT, 100%; of the ICT, 98.7%; and of the ELISA IgG and ELISA IgM, 97.4%. In the group of patients with serology positive to Brucella, at least 12.4% of sera were positive in tularemia tests (12.4% in ELISA IgM, 13.4% in MAT, 14.4% in ICT, and 15.5% in CHT and ELISA IgG). In conclusion, CHT presents a sensitivity and specificity in early diagnosis of human tularemia, similar to MAT, ICT, and ELISA IgG and ELISA IgM. Its single assay design allows lower costs, especially in areas of low endemicity or inter-epidemic periods.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 May;48(5):1629-34 - PubMed
    1. FEMS Microbiol Immunol. 1992 Oct;5(4):201-10 - PubMed
    1. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 May;20(5):754-61 - PubMed
    1. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1997 May 2;46(RR-10):1-55 - PubMed
    1. Epidemiol Infect. 2005 Aug;133(4):759-66 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback