Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Procalcitonin-Guidance Versus Usual Care for Antimicrobial Management in Critically Ill Patients: Focus on Subgroups Based on Antibiotic Initiation, Cessation, or Mixed Strategies
- PMID: 29293146
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002953
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Procalcitonin-Guidance Versus Usual Care for Antimicrobial Management in Critically Ill Patients: Focus on Subgroups Based on Antibiotic Initiation, Cessation, or Mixed Strategies
Abstract
Objective: Numerous studies have evaluated the use of procalcitonin guidance during different phases of antibiotics management (initiation, cessation, or a combination of both) in patients admitted to ICUs. Several meta-analyses have attempted to generate an overall effect of procalcitonin-guidance on patient outcomes. However, combining studies from different phases of antibiotics management may not be appropriate due to the risk of clinical heterogeneity. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of procalcitonin-guided strategies in different phases of antibiotics use.
Data sources: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until November 1, 2017.
Study selection: We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated procalcitonin guidance compared with usual care for management of antibiotics in critically ill adult patients.
Data extraction: We extracted study details, patient characteristics, procalcitonin algorithm, and outcomes.
Data synthesis: We included 15 studies, from 1,624 abstracts identified based on our search strategy (three initiation, nine cessation, and three mixed). The pooled risk ratio for short-term mortality for the initiation, cessation, and mixed procalcitonin strategies were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.86-1.15,;p = 0.91), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.98; p = 0.02), and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.80-1.29; p = 0.93), respectively. Procalcitonin for cessation and mixed strategies was associated with decrease antibiotics duration (-1.26 d [p < 0.001] and -3.10 d [p =0.04], respectively). No differences were observed in other outcome measures.
Conclusion: When evaluating all studies of procalcitonin-guided antibiotics management in critically ill patients, no difference in short-term mortality was observed. However, when only examining procalcitonin-guided cessation of antibiotics, lower mortality was detected. Future studies should focus specifically on procalcitonin for the cessation of antibiotics in critically ill patients.
Comment in
-
Is Procalcitonin-Guided Therapy Associated With Beneficial Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis?Crit Care Med. 2018 May;46(5):811-812. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003024. Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 29652705 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Ineffectiveness of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic therapy in severely critically ill patients: A meta-analysis.Int J Infect Dis. 2019 Aug;85:158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 Jun 21. Int J Infect Dis. 2019. PMID: 31229612
-
Effect of Antibiotic Discontinuation Strategies on Mortality and Infectious Complications in Critically Ill Septic Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.Crit Care Med. 2020 May;48(5):757-764. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004267. Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32191414
-
Benefits and Harms of Procalcitonin- or C-Reactive Protein-Guided Antimicrobial Discontinuation in Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct 1;52(10):e522-e534. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006366. Epub 2024 Jul 1. Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38949476
-
Procalcitonin to initiate or discontinue antibiotics in acute respiratory tract infections.Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jul;8(4):1297-371. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1927. Evid Based Child Health. 2013. PMID: 23877944 Review.
-
Procalcitonin-guided algorithms of antibiotic therapy in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2229-41. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f17bf9. Crit Care Med. 2010. PMID: 20729729 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of biomarkers in antimicrobial stewardship: physicians' perspectives.Korean J Intern Med. 2024 May;39(3):413-429. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.558. Epub 2024 Apr 30. Korean J Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38715231 Free PMC article.
-
biomArker-guided Duration of Antibiotic treatment in hospitalised Patients with suspecTed Sepsis (ADAPT-Sepsis): A protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.J Intensive Care Soc. 2023 Nov;24(4):427-434. doi: 10.1177/17511437231169193. Epub 2023 Apr 25. J Intensive Care Soc. 2023. PMID: 37841304 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a clinical pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program in a neurosurgical intensive care unit: a pre-and post-intervention cohort study.Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 22;14:1263618. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1263618. eCollection 2023. Front Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 37808195 Free PMC article.
-
Biomarkers in sepsis-looking for the Holy Grail or chasing a mirage!World J Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 9;12(4):188-203. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v12.i4.188. eCollection 2023 Sep 9. World J Crit Care Med. 2023. PMID: 37745257 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antimicrobial Stewardship Techniques for Critically Ill Patients with Pneumonia.Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;12(2):295. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020295. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36830205 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
