Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
, 33 (2), 157-170

A Network Meta-Analysis on the Comparative Efficacy of Different Dietary Approaches on Glycaemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A Network Meta-Analysis on the Comparative Efficacy of Different Dietary Approaches on Glycaemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Lukas Schwingshackl et al. Eur J Epidemiol.

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to assess the comparative efficacy of different dietary approaches on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using a systematic review of the literature. Electronic and hand searches were performed until July 2017. The inclusion criteria were defined as follows: (1) randomized trial with a dietary approach; (2) adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus; (3) outcome either HbA1c (%) and/or fasting glucose (mmol/l); (4) minimum intervention period of 12 weeks. For each outcome measure, random effects network meta-analysis was performed in order to determine the pooled effect of each intervention relative to each of the other interventions. A total of 56 trials comparing nine dietary approaches (low-fat, Vegetarian, Mediterranean, high-protein, moderate-carbohydrate, low-carbohydrate, control, low GI/GL, Palaeolithic) enrolling 4937 participants were included. For reducing HbA1c, the low-carbohydrate diet was ranked as the best dietary approach (SUCRA: 84%), followed by the Mediterranean diet (80%) and Palaeolithic diet (76%) compared to a control diet. For reducing fasting glucose, the Mediterranean diet (88%) was ranked as the best approach, followed by Palaeolithic diet (71%) and Vegetarian diet (63%). The network analysis also revealed that all dietary approaches significantly reduce HbA1c (- 0.82 to - 0.47% reduction) and fasting glucose (- 1.61 to - 1.00 mmol/l reduction) compared to a control diet. According to the network meta-analysis the Mediterranean diet is the most effective and efficacious dietary approach to improve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients.

Keywords: Diet; Evidence synthesis; Network meta-analysis; Systematic review; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of direct, indirect and mixed relative effects in a hypothetical triangle comparing three interventions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Network diagram for HbA1c: The size of the nodes is proportional to the total number of participants allocated to each dietary approach and the thickness of the lines proportional to the number of studies evaluating each direct comparison

Comment in

  • Kohlenhydrate reduzieren — nicht Fett!
    Martin S. Martin S. MMW Fortschr Med. 2018 May;160(10):35. doi: 10.1007/s15006-018-0577-y. MMW Fortschr Med. 2018. PMID: 29855907 Review. German. No abstract available.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 21 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. WHO . Fact sheet no. 312: Diabetes. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
    1. International Diabetes Federation. 2013; Sixth edition. https://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/EN_6E_Atlas_Full_0.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2016.
    1. Schwingshackl L, Bogensberger B, Hoffmann G. Diet quality as assessed by the Healthy Eating Index, Alternate Healthy Eating Index, dietary approaches to stop hypertension score, and health outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018;118(1):74–100. - PubMed
    1. Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G, Lampousi AM, et al. Food groups and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(5):363–375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwingshackl L, Missbach B, Konig J, Hoffmann G. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and risk of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(7):1292–1299. - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback