Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 18 (1), 6

The UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) What Is It? Why and How Might You Use It?

Affiliations

The UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) What Is It? Why and How Might You Use It?

Jon Dowell et al. BMC Med Educ.

Abstract

Background: Educating doctors is expensive and poor performance by future graduates can literally cost lives. Whilst the practice of medicine is highly evidence based, medical education is much less so. Research on medical school selection, undergraduate progression, Fitness to Practise (FtP) and postgraduate careers has been hampered across the globe by the challenges of uniting the data required. This paper describes the creation, structure and access arrangements for the first UK-wide attempt to do so.

Overview: A collaborative approach has created a research database commencing with all entrants to UK medical schools in 2007 and 2008 (UKMED Phase 1). Here the content is outlined, governance arrangements considered, system access explained, and the potential implications of this new resource discussed. The data currently include achievements prior to medical school entry, admissions tests, graduation point information and also all subsequent data collected by the General Medical Council, including FtP, career progression, annual National Training Survey (NTS) responses, career choice and postgraduate exam performance data. UKMED has grown since the pilot phase with additional datasets; all subsequent years of students/trainees and stronger governance processes. The inclusion of future cohorts and additional information such as admissions scores or bespoke surveys or assessments is now being piloted. Thus, for instance, new scrutiny can be applied to selection techniques and the effectiveness of educational interventions. Data are available free of charge for approved studies from suitable research groups worldwide.

Conclusion: It is anticipated that UKMED will continue on a rolling basis. This has the potential to radically change the volume and types of research that can be envisaged and, therefore, to improve standards, facilitate workforce planning and support the regulation of medical education and training. This paper aspires to encourage proposals to utilise this exciting resource.

Keywords: Education; Fitness to Practise; Graduate; Medical; Medical schools; Personnel; Selection; Undergraduate.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Katie Petty-Saphon, Sandra Nicholson and Jennifer Cleland all currently hold unremunerated roles on the UKCAT executive and have an interest in the success of this charity. Jon Dowell has previously done so. Steve Thornton provides consultancy advice for commercial organisations unrelated to UKMED and is a Trustee of a National charity (Wellbeing of Women).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
UKMED Phase 1 available data
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of UKMED available data November 2017

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 7 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. McManus IC (11 October 2016). Hunt promises 25% more medical students in 2018. Br Med J 2016;355: i5480. - PubMed
    1. Archer J, McManus IC, Woolf K, Monrouxe L, Illing J, Bullock A, Robert T. Without proper research funding, how can medical education be evidence based? Br Med J. 2015;350:h3445. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3445. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McManus IC, Powis DA, Wakeford R, Ferguson E, James D, Richards P. Intellectual aptitude tests and a levels for selecting UK school leaver entrants for medical school. Br Med J. 2005;331:555–559. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7516.555. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parry JM, Mathers JM, Stevens A, Parsons A, Lilford R, Spurgeon P, Thomas H. Admissions processes for five year medical courses at English schools: review. Br Med J. 2006;332:1005–1009. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38768.590174.55. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook DA, Andriole DA, Durning SJ, Roberts NK, Triola MM. Longitudinal research databases in medical education: facilitating the study of educational outcomes over time and across institutions. Acad Med. 2010;85(8):1340–1346. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e5c050. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback