Objective: Research findings concerning the relation between benefit from hearing aid (HA) noise suppression and working memory function are inconsistent. The current study thus investigated the effects of three noise suppression algorithms on auditory working memory and the relation with reading span.
Design: Using a computer simulation of bilaterally fitted HAs, four settings were tested: (1) unprocessed, (2) directional microphones, (3) single-channel noise reduction, and (4) binaural coherence-based noise reduction. Settings 2-4 were matched in terms of the speech-weighted signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) improvement. Auditory working memory was assessed at +6 dB SNR using listening span and N-back paradigms.
Study sample: Twenty experienced HA users aged 55-80 years with large differences in reading span.
Results: For the listening span measurements, there was an influence of HA setting on sentence-final word recognition and recall, with the directional microphones leading to ∼6% better performance than the single-channel noise reduction. For the N-back measurements, there was substantial test-retest variability and no influence of HA setting. No interactions with reading span were found.
Conclusion: HA noise suppression may affect the recognition and recall of speech at positive SNRs, irrespective of individual reading span. Future work should improve the reliability of the auditory working memory measurements.
Keywords: Hearing aids; cognition; individual differences; noise reduction; working memory.