Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 9;8(1):127.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18023-4.

Synchrony and Physiological Arousal Increase Cohesion and Cooperation in Large Naturalistic Groups

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Synchrony and Physiological Arousal Increase Cohesion and Cooperation in Large Naturalistic Groups

Joshua Conrad Jackson et al. Sci Rep. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Separate research streams have identified synchrony and arousal as two factors that might contribute to the effects of human rituals on social cohesion and cooperation. But no research has manipulated these variables in the field to investigate their causal - and potentially interactive - effects on prosocial behaviour. Across four experimental sessions involving large samples of strangers, we manipulated the synchronous and physiologically arousing affordances of a group marching task within a sports stadium. We observed participants' subsequent movement, grouping, and cooperation via a camera hidden in the stadium's roof. Synchrony and arousal both showed main effects, predicting larger groups, tighter clustering, and more cooperative behaviour in a free-rider dilemma. Synchrony and arousal also interacted on measures of clustering and cooperation such that synchrony only encouraged closer clustering-and encouraged greater cooperation-when paired with physiological arousal. The research helps us understand why synchrony and arousal often co-occur in rituals around the world. It also represents the first use of real-time spatial tracking as a precise and naturalistic method of simulating collective rituals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental marching task (synchrony condition) as seen from the hidden camera (left panel) and as reconstructed by our tracking software (right panel). Coloured lines in the right panel correspond to participants’ movements over the tracking period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Group formation (top panels) and dispersal (bottom panels). The left-hand panels depict participants at the beginning of the tasks. The right-hand panels depict participants at the conclusion of the tasks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Group size (far left), interpersonal proximity during dispersal (middle) and speed during the cooperation task (far right) as a function of the arousal and synchrony conditions.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atran S, Henrich J. The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory. 2010;5(1):18–30. doi: 10.1162/BIOT_a_00018. - DOI
    1. Durkheim E. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912).
    1. Fischer R, Xygalatas D. Extreme rituals as social technologies. Journal of Cognition and Culture. 2014;14(5):345–355. doi: 10.1163/15685373-12342130. - DOI
    1. Radcliffe-Brown AR. Religion and society. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 1945;75(1):33–43. doi: 10.2307/2844278. - DOI
    1. Rappaport R. A. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity (Cambridge University Press, 1999).

Publication types