Pursuing meaningful end-points for stem cell therapy assessment in ischemic cardiac disease
- PMID: 29321822
- PMCID: PMC5746641
- DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v9.i12.203
Pursuing meaningful end-points for stem cell therapy assessment in ischemic cardiac disease
Abstract
Despite optimal interventional and medical therapy, ischemic heart disease is still an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although not included in standard of care rehabilitation, stem cell therapy (SCT) could be a solution for prompting cardiac regeneration. Multiple studies have been published from the beginning of SCT until now, but overall no unanimous conclusion could be drawn in part due to the lack of appropriate end-points. In order to appreciate the impact of SCT, multiple markers from different categories should be considered: Structural, biological, functional, physiological, but also major adverse cardiac events or quality of life. Imaging end-points are among the most used - especially left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) measured through different methods. Other imaging parameters are infarct size, myocardial viability and perfusion. The impact of SCT on all of the aforementioned end-points is controversial and debatable. 2D-echocardiography is widely exploited, but new approaches such as tissue Doppler, strain/strain rate or 3D-echocardiography are more accurate, especially since the latter one is comparable with the MRI gold standard estimation of LVEF. Apart from the objective parameters, there are also patient-centered evaluations to reveal the benefits of SCT, such as quality of life and performance status, the most valuable from the patient point of view. Emerging parameters investigating molecular pathways such as non-coding RNAs or inflammation cytokines have a high potential as prognostic factors. Due to the disadvantages of current techniques, new imaging methods with labelled cells tracked along their lifetime seem promising, but until now only pre-clinical trials have been conducted in humans. Overall, SCT is characterized by high heterogeneity not only in preparation, administration and type of cells, but also in quantification of therapy effects.
Keywords: Cardiac imaging techniques; Cardiac regeneration; End-points; Ischemic cardiac disease; Stem cell therapy.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article. No financial support.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17. Stroke. 2003. PMID: 12869717
-
Efficacy of stem cell in improvement of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction--MI3 Trial.Indian J Med Res. 2015 Aug;142(2):165-74. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.164245. Indian J Med Res. 2015. PMID: 26354213 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC) Consensus Conference on the state of the art of contrast echocardiography.Ital Heart J. 2004 Apr;5(4):309-34. Ital Heart J. 2004. PMID: 15185894 Review.
-
European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging/Cardiovascular Imaging Department of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology recommendations for the use of cardiac imaging to assess and follow patients after heart transplantation.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;16(9):919-48. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev139. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 26139361 Review.
-
Is the measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction the proper end point for cell therapy trials? An analysis of the effect of bone marrow mononuclear stem cell administration on left ventricular ejection fraction after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction when evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.Am Heart J. 2011 Oct;162(4):671-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.06.019. Am Heart J. 2011. PMID: 21982659 Review.
Cited by
-
Regenerative Medicine for the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease; Status and Future Perspectives.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Sep 10;9:704903. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.704903. eCollection 2021. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021. PMID: 34568321 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Moving forward on the pathway of cell-based therapies in ischemic heart disease and heart failure - time for new recommendations?World J Stem Cells. 2019 Aug 26;11(8):445-451. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v11.i8.445. World J Stem Cells. 2019. PMID: 31523365 Free PMC article.
-
The Winding Road of Cardiac Regeneration-Stem Cell Omics in the Spotlight.Cells. 2018 Dec 7;7(12):255. doi: 10.3390/cells7120255. Cells. 2018. PMID: 30544622 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Fernández-Avilés F, Sanz-Ruiz R, Climent AM, Badimon L, Bolli R, Charron D, Fuster V, Janssens S, Kastrup J, Kim HS, Lüscher TF, Martin JF, Menasché P, Simari RD, Stone GW, Terzic A, Willerson JT, Wu JC; TACTICS (Transnational Alliance for Regenerative Therapies in Cardiovascular Syndromes) Writing Group; Authors/Task Force Members. Chairpersons; Basic Research Subcommittee; Translational Research Subcommittee; Challenges of Cardiovascular Regenerative Medicine Subcommittee; Tissue Engineering Subcommittee; Delivery, Navigation, Tracking and Assessment Subcommittee; Clinical Trials Subcommittee; Regulatory and funding strategies subcommittee; Delivery, Navigation, Tracking and Assessment Subcommittee. Global position paper on cardiovascular regenerative medicine. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2532–2546. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kang HJ, Kim HS, Zhang SY, Park KW, Cho HJ, Koo BK, Kim YJ, Soo Lee D, Sohn DW, Han KS, et al. Effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood stem-cells mobilised with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on left ventricular systolic function and restenosis after coronary stenting in myocardial infarction: the MAGIC cell randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2004;363:751–756. - PubMed
-
- Kang HJ, Kim HS, Koo BK, Kim YJ, Lee D, Sohn DW, Oh BH, Park YB. Intracoronary infusion of the mobilized peripheral blood stem cell by G-CSF is better than mobilization alone by G-CSF for improvement of cardiac function and remodeling: 2-year follow-up results of the Myocardial Regeneration and Angiogenesis in Myocardial Infarction with G-CSF and Intra-Coronary Stem Cell Infusion (MAGIC Cell) 1 trial. Am Heart J. 2007;153:237.e1–237.e8. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
