Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of distal radius fractures

Marc Schnetzke; Julia Fuchs; Sven Y Vetter; Benedict Swartman; Holger Keil; Paul-Alfred Grützner; Jochen Franke

doi:10.1007/s00402-018-2867-3

Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of distal radius fractures

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Apr;138(4):487-493. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2867-3. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

Authors

Marc Schnetzke¹, Julia Fuchs¹, Sven Y Vetter¹, Benedict Swartman¹, Holger Keil¹, Paul-Alfred Grützner¹, Jochen Franke²

Affiliations

¹ Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen at the University of Heidelberg, MINTOS, Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.
² Clinic for Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen at the University of Heidelberg, MINTOS, Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany. Jochen.Franke@bgu-ludwigshafen.de.

PMID: 29322319
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-2867-3

Abstract

Introduction: In operative treatment of distal radius fractures satisfying outcome mainly relies on anatomical fracture reduction and correct implant placement. Examination with two-dimensional fluoroscopy may not provide reliable information about this. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of additional intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the operative treatment of comminuted distal radius fractures.

Materials and methods: From August 2001 to June 2015, patients with a distal radius fracture who were treated operatively and received intraoperative three-dimensional scan were included. The findings of the three-dimensional scan were documented by the operative surgeon and analyzed retrospectively with regard to incidence and the need for intraoperative revisions. Clinical evaluation included the patient's medical history, the injury pattern of the affected wrist (according to the OTA/AO fracture classification) and concomitant injuries. Intraoperative and postoperative complications and revision surgeries were evaluated as well.

Results: Of 4515 operatively treated distal radius fractures, 307 (6.8%) received additional intraoperative three-dimensional imaging during surgery. 263 of 307 patients (85.7%) had a distal radius fracture type C. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging revealed findings in 125 patients (40.7%) that were not detected on conventional two-dimensional fluoroscopy. In 54 patients (17.6%) these findings led to an immediate revision. Most commonly, revision was done in the case of remaining steps in the articular surface ≥ 1 mm (n = 25, 8.1%) followed by intra-articular screw placement (n = 23, 7.5%).

Conclusions: Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging can provide additional information compared to conventional two-dimensional fluoroscopy in the operative treatment of distal radius fractures with the possibility of immediate intraoperative revision.

Keywords: Complication; Distal radius fracture; Intra-articular screw; Revision surgery; Three-dimensional imaging; Two-dimensional fluoroscopy.

MeSH terms

Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional*
Radius Fractures / diagnostic imaging*
Radius Fractures / surgery*
Retrospective Studies