Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Jan;50(1):56-61.e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2016.12.004.

Daily and Seasonal Influences on Dietary Self-monitoring Using a Smartphone Application

Christine A Pellegrini  1 , David E Conroy  2 , Siobhan M Phillips  3 , Angela Fidler Pfammatter  3 , H Gene McFadden  3 , Bonnie Spring  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Daily and Seasonal Influences on Dietary Self-monitoring Using a Smartphone Application

Christine A Pellegrini et al. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To examine within-person variation in dietary self-monitoring during a 6-month technology-supported weight loss trial as a function of time-varying factors including time in the study, day of the week, and month of the year.

Methods: Smartphone self-monitoring data were examined from 31 obese adults (aged 18-60 years) who participated in a 6-month technology-supported weight loss program. Multilevel regression modeling was used to examine within-person variation in dietary self-monitoring.

Results: Participants recorded less as time in the study progressed. Fewer foods were reported on the weekends compared with weekdays. More foods were self-monitored in January compared with October; however, a seasonal effect was not observed.

Conclusions and implications: The amount of time in a study and day of the week were associated with dietary self-monitoring but not season. Future studies should examine factors that influence variations in self-monitoring and identify methods to improve technology-supported dietary self-monitoring adherence.

Keywords: adherence; apps; diet; diet tracking; obesity; self-monitoring; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Number of Food Items Recorded Daily Decreased During a 6-Month Technology-Supported Behavioral Weight Loss Intervention
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted Multilevel Model Coefficients by Day of the Week Based on the Number of Foods Self-Monitored
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Baker R, Kirschenbaum D. Self-Monitoring may be necessary for successful weight control. Behav Ther. 1993;24:377–394.
    1. Boutelle KN, Kirschenbaum DS. Further support for consistent self-monitoring as a vital component of successful weight control. Obes Res. 1998 May;6(3):219–224. - PubMed
    1. Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011 Jan;111(1):92–102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009 Nov;28(6):690–701. - PubMed
    1. Kanfer FH. Self-monitoring: Methodological limitations and clinical applications. J Consult Clin Psych. 1970;35(2):148–152.

Publication types