Objective: The purpose of this study is to describe the focus and comprehensiveness of domains measured in e-cigarette research.
Methods: A portfolio analysis of National Institutes of Health grants focusing on e-cigarette research and funded between the fiscal years 2007 and 2015 was conducted. Grant proposals were retrieved using a government database and coded using the Host-Agent-Vector-Environment (HAVE) model as a framework to characterise the measures proposed. Eighty-one projects met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis.
Results: The primary HAVE focus most commonly found was Host (73%), followed by Agent (21%), Vector (6%) and Environment (0%). Intrapersonal measures and use trajectories were the most common measures in studies that include Host measures (n=59 and n=51, respectively). Product composition was the most common area of measurement in Agent studies (n=24), whereas Marketing (n=21) was the most common (n=21) area of Vector measurement. When Environment measures were examined as secondary measures in studies, they primarily focused on measuring Peer, Occupation and Social Networks (n=18). Although all studies mentioned research on e-cigarettes, most (n=52; 64%) did not specify the type of e-cigarette device or liquid solution under study.
Conclusions: This analysis revealed a heavy focus on Host measures (73%) and a lack of focus on Environment measures. The predominant focus on Host measures may have the unintended effect of limiting the evidence base for tobacco control and regulatory science. Further, a lack of specificity about the e-cigarette product under study will make comparing results across studies and using the outcomes to inform tobacco policy difficult.
Keywords: electronic nicotine delivery devices; non-cigarette tobacco products; prevention.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2020. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
National Institutes of Health Funding for Tobacco Control: 2006 and 2016.Am J Health Promot. 2019 Feb;33(2):279-284. doi: 10.1177/0890117118779013. Epub 2018 May 30. Am J Health Promot. 2019. PMID: 29847996 Free PMC article.
The importance of product definitions in US e-cigarette laws and regulations.Tob Control. 2016 Apr;25(e1):e44-51. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051913. Epub 2014 Dec 14. Tob Control. 2016. PMID: 25512432 Free PMC article.
Recall of Point-of-Sale Marketing Predicts Cigar and E-Cigarette Use Among Texas Youth.Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jul 9;20(8):962-969. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx237. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018. PMID: 29069425 Free PMC article.
Electronic cigarettes: product characterisation and design considerations.Tob Control. 2014 May;23 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii4-10. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051476. Tob Control. 2014. PMID: 24732162 Free PMC article. Review.
Establishing consensus on survey measures for electronic nicotine and non-nicotine delivery system use: Current challenges and considerations for researchers.Addict Behav. 2018 Apr;79:203-212. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.016. Epub 2017 Nov 16. Addict Behav. 2018. PMID: 29173942 Free PMC article. Review.