Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study
- PMID: 29337092
- PMCID: PMC5805863
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30891-4
Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: Retrospective studies provide conflicting interpretations of the effect of inherited genetic factors on the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation on breast cancer outcomes in patients with young-onset breast cancer.
Methods: We did a prospective cohort study of female patients recruited from 127 hospitals in the UK aged 40 years or younger at first diagnosis (by histological confirmation) of invasive breast cancer. Patients with a previous invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) were excluded. Patients were identified within 12 months of initial diagnosis. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were identified using blood DNA collected at recruitment. Clinicopathological data, and data regarding treatment and long-term outcomes, including date and site of disease recurrence, were collected from routine medical records at 6 months, 12 months, and then annually until death or loss to follow-up. The primary outcome was overall survival for all BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers (BRCA-positive) versus all non-carriers (BRCA-negative) at 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years after diagnosis. A prespecified subgroup analysis of overall survival was done in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Recruitment was completed in 2008, and long-term follow-up is continuing.
Findings: Between Jan 24, 2000, and Jan 24, 2008, we recruited 2733 women. Genotyping detected a pathogenic BRCA mutation in 338 (12%) patients (201 with BRCA1, 137 with BRCA2). After a median follow-up of 8·2 years (IQR 6·0-9·9), 651 (96%) of 678 deaths were due to breast cancer. There was no significant difference in overall survival between BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative patients in multivariable analyses at any timepoint (at 2 years: 97·0% [95% CI 94·5-98·4] vs 96·6% [95·8-97·3]; at 5 years: 83·8% [79·3-87·5] vs 85·0% [83·5-86·4]; at 10 years: 73·4% [67·4-78·5] vs 70·1% [67·7-72·3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·96 [95% CI 0·76-1·22]; p=0·76). Of 558 patients with triple-negative breast cancer, BRCA mutation carriers had better overall survival than non-carriers at 2 years (95% [95% CI 89-97] vs 91% [88-94]; HR 0·59 [95% CI 0·35-0·99]; p=0·047) but not 5 years (81% [73-87] vs 74% [70-78]; HR 1·13 [0·70-1·84]; p=0·62) or 10 years (72% [62-80] vs 69% [63-74]; HR 2·12 [0·82-5·49]; p= 0·12).
Interpretation: Patients with young-onset breast cancer who carry a BRCA mutation have similar survival as non-carriers. However, BRCA mutation carriers with triple-negative breast cancer might have a survival advantage during the first few years after diagnosis compared with non-carriers. Decisions about timing of additional surgery aimed at reducing future second primary-cancer risks should take into account patient prognosis associated with the first malignancy and patient preferences.
Funding: Cancer Research UK, the UK National Cancer Research Network, the Wessex Cancer Trust, Breast Cancer Now, and the PPP Healthcare Medical Trust Grant.
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Breast cancer in young women: do BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations matter?Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):150-151. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30008-1. Epub 2018 Jan 11. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29337093 No abstract available.
-
Genetic testing for young women with breast cancer.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):e182. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30162-1. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29611519 No abstract available.
-
Genetic testing for young women with breast cancer - Authors' reply.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):e183. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30205-5. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29611520 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Germline breast cancer susceptibility gene mutations and breast cancer outcomes.BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 22;18(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4229-5. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29566657 Free PMC article.
-
Twenty-one-gene recurrence score assay in BRCA-associated versus sporadic breast cancers: Differences based on germline mutation status.Cancer. 2016 Apr 15;122(8):1178-84. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29903. Epub 2016 Feb 9. Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26859126
-
Effect of BRCA germline mutations on breast cancer prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(40):e4975. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004975. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. PMID: 27749552 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Breast Cancer Survival of BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Carriers in a Hospital-Based Cohort of Young Women.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Aug 1;109(8). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw329. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017. PMID: 28376189
-
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30141832 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Reproductive Risk Factor Patterns in Caribbean Women With Breast Cancer Across 4 Generations.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438091. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38091. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39378034 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence, prognosis, and health care resource utilization in carriers of pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1/2 with incident early-stage breast cancer: a Finnish population-based study.Acta Oncol. 2024 Sep 25;63:736-745. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40829. Acta Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39319938 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a breast cancer risk assessment and primary prevention pathway for women aged 30-39 years: Views of UK primary care providers on the role of primary care.PLoS One. 2024 Sep 13;19(9):e0308638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308638. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39269936 Free PMC article.
-
A Prognostic Risk Signature of Two Autophagy-Related Genes for Predicting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Outcomes.Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024 Sep 2;16:529-544. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S475007. eCollection 2024. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024. PMID: 39246674 Free PMC article.
-
BRCA-mutated breast cancer: the unmet need, challenges and therapeutic benefits of genetic testing.Br J Cancer. 2024 Nov;131(9):1400-1414. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02827-z. Epub 2024 Aug 30. Br J Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39215191 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Malone KE, Daling JR, Doody DR. Prevalence and predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of breast cancer in white and black American women ages 35 to 64 years. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8297–8308. - PubMed
-
- Anders CK, Hsu DS, Broadwater G. Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3324–3330. - PubMed
-
- Lakhani SR, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP. Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1138–1145. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- A11699/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- C22524/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- C1275/A7572/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 15956/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- A19187/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 17528/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 16565/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 25352/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 16561/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 19187/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 10118/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 2005NOV53/BCN_/Breast Cancer Now/United Kingdom
- 10119/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 16895/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
- 26884/CRUK_/Cancer Research UK/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
