Cost-effectiveness analyses of genetic and genomic diagnostic tests
- PMID: 29353875
- DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2017.108
Cost-effectiveness analyses of genetic and genomic diagnostic tests
Abstract
Developments in next-generation sequencing technologies have driven the clinical application of diagnostic tests that interrogate the whole genome, which offer the chance to diagnose rare inherited diseases or inform the targeting of therapies. New genomic diagnostic tests compete with traditional approaches to diagnosis, including the genetic testing of single genes and other clinical strategies, for finite health-care budgets. In this context, decision analytic model-based cost-effectiveness analysis is a useful method to help evaluate the costs versus consequences of introducing new health-care interventions. This Perspective presents key methodological, technical, practical and organizational challenges that must be considered by decision-makers responsible for the allocation of health-care resources to obtain robust and timely information about the relative cost-effectiveness of the increasing numbers of emerging genomic tests.
Similar articles
-
Standardized decision support in next generation sequencing reports of somatic cancer variants.Mol Oncol. 2014 Jul;8(5):859-73. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.03.021. Epub 2014 Apr 4. Mol Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24768039 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Toward health technology assessment of whole-genome sequencing diagnostic tests: challenges and solutions.Per Med. 2017 May;14(3):235-247. doi: 10.2217/pme-2016-0089. Epub 2017 May 5. Per Med. 2017. PMID: 29767583
-
Genetic screening: birthright or earned with age?Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017 Aug;17(8):735-738. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2017.1346473. Epub 2017 Jun 29. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017. PMID: 28641021 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Clinically Responsive Genomic Analysis Pipelines: Elements to Improve Detection Rate and Efficiency.J Mol Diagn. 2021 Jul;23(7):894-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.04.007. Epub 2021 May 5. J Mol Diagn. 2021. PMID: 33962052
-
Assessing the Value of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests in a Dynamic Environment.Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:139-146. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_200825. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018. PMID: 30231307 Review.
Cited by
-
Application of Economic Evaluation to Assess Feasibility for Reimbursement of Genomic Testing as Part of Personalized Medicine Interventions.Front Pharmacol. 2019 Aug 2;10:830. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00830. eCollection 2019. Front Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 31427963 Free PMC article.
-
Half of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants found on panel tests do not fulfil NHS testing criteria.Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 21;12(1):2507. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06376-4. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35190596 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of male infertility genes.Hum Reprod. 2019 May 1;34(5):932-941. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez022. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 30865283 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for women with subfertility in China: an economic evaluation using evidence from the CESE-PGS trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 14;23(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05563-z. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37060068 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Targeted Exome Analysis as a Diagnostic Test in Glomerular Diseases.Kidney Int Rep. 2021 Sep 8;6(11):2850-2861. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.08.028. eCollection 2021 Nov. Kidney Int Rep. 2021. PMID: 34805637 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
