Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 5;496(2):746-752.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.01.092.

1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 mitigates cancer cell mediated mitochondrial dysfunction in human skeletal muscle cells

Affiliations

1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 mitigates cancer cell mediated mitochondrial dysfunction in human skeletal muscle cells

Zachary C Ryan et al. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. .

Abstract

Cancer cachexia is associated with muscle weakness and atrophy. We investigated whether 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1α,25(OH)2D3), which has previously been shown to increase skeletal myoblast oxygen consumption rate, could reverse the deleterious effects of tumor cell conditioned medium on myoblast function. Conditioned medium from Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC1) cells inhibits oxygen consumption, increases mitochondrial fragmentation, inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase activity, and enhances proteasomal activity in human skeletal muscle myoblasts. 1α,25(OH)2D3 reverses the tumor cell-mediated changes in mitochondrial oxygen consumption and proteasomal activity, without changing pyruvate dehydrogenase activity. 1α,25(OH)2D3 might be useful in treatment of weakness seen in association with CC.

Keywords: 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3); Cancer; Gene expression; Mitochondria; Oxygen consumption; Skeletal muscle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was measured in human myoblasts following the addition of LLC1 non-conditioned medium (NCM, □) or LLC1 conditioned medium (CM, ▲) for 24 h. A. OCR in myoblasts in the presence or absence of indicated reagents. B: Basal respiration. C: maximal respiration. D: coupled OCR. E: reserve capacity. * = statistically significant change.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
OCR was measured in myoblasts following the addition of LLC1 non-conditioned medium (NCM, □) or LLC1 conditioned medium to which was added 1α,25(OH)2D3 (CM + 1α,25(OH)2D3, ▲) for period of 24 h. A. OCR was measured in human skeletal muscle myoblasts in the presence or absence of re-agents as indicated. B: Basal respiration. C: maximal respiration. D: coupled OCR. E: reserve capacity.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Upper panel: A Morphology of labeled myoblast mitochondria following addition of LLC1 non-CM to cells. B: Morphology of mitochondria in myoblasts treated with LLC1 non-CM using EM. C: Morphology of labeled myoblast mitochondria following addition of LLC1 CM to cells. D: Morphology of mitochondria in myoblasts treated with LLC1 CM using EM. Note presence of filamentous mitochondria in myo-blasts treated with LLC1 non-CM, panels A and B. Following treatment of myoblasts with LLC1 CM, panels C and D, appear fragmented. Lower panel: A: Morphology of labeled myoblast mitochondria following addition of LLC1 CM to cells. B: Morphology of mitochondria in myoblasts treated with LLC1 CM using EM. C: Morphology of labeled myoblast mitochondria following addition of LLC1 CM + 1α,25(OH)2D3, 10−8M to cells. D: Morphology of mitochondria in myoblasts treated with LLC1 CM + 1α,25(OH)2D3, 10−8M using EM. Note presence of fragmented mitochondria in myoblasts treated with LLC1 CM, panels A and B. Following treatment of myoblasts with LLC1 CM + 1α,25(OH)2D3, 10−8M, panels C and D, mitochondria , appear filamentous.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A. Aspect ratio of labeled myoblast mitochondria B. Form factor of labeled myoblast mitochondria following addition of LLC1 non-conditioned medium (NCM), LLC1 conditioned medium (CM) or LLC1 conditioned medium (CM) + 1α,25(OH)2D3,10−8M.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:489–495. - PubMed
    1. van Vugt JL, Levolger S, Coelen RJ, et al. The impact of sarcopenia on survival and complications in surgical oncology: a review of the current literature. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112:681–682. - PubMed
    1. Catalano MG, Fortunati N, Arena K, et al. Selective up-regulation of tumor necrosis factor receptor I in tumor-bearing rats with cancer-related cachexia. Int J Oncol. 2003;23:429–436. - PubMed
    1. Ebrahimi B, Tucker SL, Li D, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Cytokines in pancreatic carcinoma: correlation with phenotypic characteristics and prognosis. Cancer. 2004;101:2727–2736. - PubMed
    1. Costelli P, Muscaritoli M, Bonetto A, et al. Muscle myostatin signalling is enhanced in experimental cancer cachexia. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008;38:531–538. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources