Topical azelaic acid and the treatment of acne: a clinical and laboratory comparison with oral tetracycline

Br J Dermatol. 1986 Apr;114(4):493-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1986.tb02856.x.

Abstract

Topical azelaic acid and oral tetracycline were compared in a 6-month double-blind study for treatment of acne vulgaris in 45 male subjects with clinical acne. Their acne was graded, inflamed or non-inflamed, lesions were counted and the density of their skin microflora was measured. Both treatments were of benefit and produced only a few minor side-effects. Although oral tetracycline was more effective than azelaic acid, the differences were only just significant. The average reduction in numbers of cutaneous micrococcaceae and Propionibacterium sp. with azelaic acid treatment was 224 and 30-fold, respectively. In a separate group of 11 male subjects with physiological acne the effect of azelaic acid on sebum excretion rate was assessed, and little change was detected.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Acne Vulgaris / drug therapy*
  • Acne Vulgaris / pathology
  • Administration, Topical
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Dicarboxylic Acids / administration & dosage
  • Dicarboxylic Acids / therapeutic use*
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Skin / pathology
  • Tetracycline / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Dicarboxylic Acids
  • azelaic acid
  • Tetracycline