Poor medical care for people with migraine in Europe - evidence from the Eurolight study
- PMID: 29392600
- PMCID: PMC5794675
- DOI: 10.1186/s10194-018-0839-1
Poor medical care for people with migraine in Europe - evidence from the Eurolight study
Abstract
Background: Migraine is prevalent everywhere, and disabling. It is also neglected: consequently, it is under-diagnosed and undertreated. We analysed data from the Eurolight study on consultations and utilization of migraine-specific medications as indicators of adequacy of medical care in Europe.
Methods: Eurolight was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey in 10 European countries. Sampling was population-based in six (Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Spain) and from consecutive patients attending general practitioners (GPs) for any reason in three (Austria, France, UK). Additional samples in Netherlands and Spain, and the only sample from Ireland, were recruited by lay headache organisations. We recorded migraine prevalence and frequency, and utilization of medical services and medications (acute and preventative).
Results: Among 9247 participants (mean age 43.9 ± 13.9 years, M/F ratio 1:1.4), 3466 (37.6%) were diagnosed with migraine (definite or probable). Of these, 1175 (33.8%) reported frequent migraine (> 5 days/month) and might clearly expect benefit from, and therefore had need of, preventative medication. In population-based samples, minorities of participants with migraine had seen a GP (9.5-18.0%) or specialist (3.1-15.0%), and smaller minorities received adequate treatment: triptans 3.4-11.0%, with Spain outlying at 22.4%; preventative medication (1.6-6.4% of those eligible, with Spain again outlying at 13.7%). Proportions were greater in GP-based samples (13.6-24.5% using triptans, 4.4-9.1% on preventative medication) and among those from lay organisations (46.2-68.2% and 16.0-41.7%). Participants with migraine who had consulted specialists (3.1-33.8%) were receiving the best care by these indicators; those treated by GPs (9.5-29.6%) fared less well, and those dependent on self-medication (48.0-84.2%) were, apparently, inadequately treated.
Conclusion: In wealthy European countries, too few people with migraine consult physicians, with proportionately too many of these seeing specialists, and migraine-specific medications are used inadequately even among those who do. These findings represent yet another call for action in Europe to improve care for people with headache. Education of both health-care providers and the public should be central to this action.
Keywords: Eurolight project; Europe; Global campaign against headache; Headache; Health care; Health policy; Impact; Migraine.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests
TJS and ZK are directors and trustees of
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impact of headache disorders in Italy and the public-health and policy implications: a population-based study within the Eurolight Project.J Headache Pain. 2015;16:100. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0584-7. Epub 2015 Dec 1. J Headache Pain. 2015. PMID: 26627710 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and burden of headache disorders in Lithuania and their public-health and policy implications: a population-based study within the Eurolight Project.J Headache Pain. 2017 Dec;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0759-5. Epub 2017 May 4. J Headache Pain. 2017. PMID: 28474253 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of headache in Europe: principal results of the Eurolight project.J Headache Pain. 2014 May 21;15(1):31. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-15-31. J Headache Pain. 2014. PMID: 24884549 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of medication overuse headache across classes of treatments for acute migraine.J Headache Pain. 2016 Dec;17(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0696-8. Epub 2016 Nov 24. J Headache Pain. 2016. PMID: 27882516 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health care resource utilization and costs associated with diagnosed medication overuse headache and potential acute medication overuse in individuals with migraine.Cephalalgia. 2024 Feb;44(2):3331024241235139. doi: 10.1177/03331024241235139. Cephalalgia. 2024. PMID: 38410849 Review.
Cited by
-
Anti-CGRP and Anti-CGRP Receptor Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prophylaxis: Retrospective Observational Study on 209 Patients.J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 17;13(4):1130. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041130. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38398444 Free PMC article.
-
Unmet Needs of Patients Living with Migraine in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries.Pain Ther. 2024 Apr;13(2):201-210. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00576-8. Epub 2024 Jan 27. Pain Ther. 2024. PMID: 38280147 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment Patterns for and Characteristics of Headache in Children and Adolescents Aged 6-17 Years in Japan: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of Health Insurance Claims Data.Life (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;14(1):96. doi: 10.3390/life14010096. Life (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38255711 Free PMC article.
-
Acute Treatment of Migraine: Expert Consensus Statements from the United Arab Emirates (UAE).Neurol Ther. 2024 Jan 19. doi: 10.1007/s40120-023-00576-4. Online ahead of print. Neurol Ther. 2024. PMID: 38240944
-
Ultra-late response (> 24 weeks) to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.J Neurol. 2024 Jan 17. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-12103-4. Online ahead of print. J Neurol. 2024. PMID: 38231271
References
-
- Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, Alvarado M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Bahalim AN, Barker-Collo S, Barrero LH, Bartels DH, Basáñez MG, Baxter A, Bell ML, Benjamin EJ, Bennett D, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2163–2196. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, Bertozzi-Villa A, Biryukov S, Bolliger I, Charlson F, Davis A, Degenhardt L, Dicker D, Duan L, Erskine H, Feigin VL, Ferrari AJ, Fitzmaurice C, Fleming T, Graetz N, Guinovart C, Haagsma J, Hansen GM, Hanson SW, Heuton KR, Higashi H, Kassebaum N, Kyu H, Laurie E, Liang X, Lofgren K, Lozano R, MacIntyre MF, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2015;386:743–800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Vos T, Allen C, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown A, Carter A, Casey DC, Charlson FJ, Chen AZ, Coggeshall M, Cornaby L, Dandona L, Dicker DJ, Dilegge T, Erskine HE, Ferrari AJ, Fitzmaurice C, Fleming T, Forouzanfar MH, Fullman N, Gething PW, Goldberg EM, Graetz N, Haagsma JA, Hay SI, Johnson CO, Kassebaum NJ, Kawashima T, Kemmer L, Khalil IA, Kinfu Y, Kyu HH, Leung J, Liang X, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388:1545–1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
