Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 14 (2), e1007155

The Rate and Potential Relevance of New Mutations in a Colonizing Plant Lineage


The Rate and Potential Relevance of New Mutations in a Colonizing Plant Lineage

Moises Exposito-Alonso et al. PLoS Genet.


By following the evolution of populations that are initially genetically homogeneous, much can be learned about core biological principles. For example, it allows for detailed studies of the rate of emergence of de novo mutations and their change in frequency due to drift and selection. Unfortunately, in multicellular organisms with generation times of months or years, it is difficult to set up and carry out such experiments over many generations. An alternative is provided by "natural evolution experiments" that started from colonizations or invasions of new habitats by selfing lineages. With limited or missing gene flow from other lineages, new mutations and their effects can be easily detected. North America has been colonized in historic times by the plant Arabidopsis thaliana, and although multiple intercrossing lineages are found today, many of the individuals belong to a single lineage, HPG1. To determine in this lineage the rate of substitutions-the subset of mutations that survived natural selection and drift-, we have sequenced genomes from plants collected between 1863 and 2006. We identified 73 modern and 27 herbarium specimens that belonged to HPG1. Using the estimated substitution rate, we infer that the last common HPG1 ancestor lived in the early 17th century, when it was most likely introduced by chance from Europe. Mutations in coding regions are depleted in frequency compared to those in other portions of the genome, consistent with purifying selection. Nevertheless, a handful of mutations is found at high frequency in present-day populations. We link these to detectable phenotypic variance in traits of known ecological importance, life history and growth, which could reflect their adaptive value. Our work showcases how, by applying genomics methods to a combination of modern and historic samples from colonizing lineages, we can directly study new mutations and their potential evolutionary relevance.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


Fig 1
Fig 1. Geographic location and temporal distribution of HPG1 samples.
(A) Sampling locations of herbarium (blue) and modern individuals (green). (B) Temporal distribution of samples (random vertical jitter for visualization purposes). (C) Linear regression of latitude and longitude as a function of collection year (p-value of the slope and Pearson correlation coefficient are indicated).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Relationship among herbarium and modern samples.
(A) Neighbor joining tree with all 123 samples (dots) and rooted with the most distant sample. The black clade of almost-identical samples is the HPG1 lineage. Scale line shows the equivalent branch length of over 25,000 nucleotide changes. (B) Neighbor joining tree only with the HPG1 black clade from (A). Colors represent herbarium (blue) and modern individuals (green). Scale line shows the equivalent branch length of 80 nucleotide changes. Note that no outgroup was included. (C, D) Network of samples using the parsimony splits algorithm, before (C) and after (D) removing three intra-HPG1 recombinants (in red). Note that the network algorithm returns in (D) a network devoid of any reticulation, which indicates absence of intra-haplogroup recombination.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Substitution rates.
(A) Bayesian phylogenetic analyses employing tip-calibration. A total of 10,000 trees were superimposed as transparent lines, and the most common topology was plotted solidly. Tree branches were calibrated with their corresponding collection dates. (B) Maximum Clade Credibility (MCC) tree summarizing the trees in (A). Note the scale line shows the equivalent branch length of 50 nucleotide changes. The grey transparent bar indicates the 95% Highest Posterior Probability of the root date. (C) Regression between pairwise net genetic and time distances. The slope of the linear regression line corresponds to the genome substitution rate per year. (D) Substitution spectra in HPG1 samples, compared to greenhouse-grown mutation accumulation (MA) lines. (E) Comparison of genome-wide, intergenic, intronic, and genic substitution rates in HPG1 and mutation rates in greenhouse-grown MA lines. Substitution rates for HPG1 were re-scaled to a per generation basis assuming different generation times. Confidence intervals in HPG1 substitution rates were obtained from 95% confidence intervals of the slope from 1,000 bootstraps (S4 Table for actual values).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Density of SNPs along all chromosomes and location of GWAS hits.
Black line shows number of SNPs per 100 kb window. Centromere locations are indicated by grey shading. Vertical lines indicate SNPs associated with root phenotypes (red) and climatic variables (blue) (Table 1 and S5 Table).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 15 PubMed Central articles

See all "Cited by" articles


    1. Green RE, Shapiro B. Human evolution: turning back the clock. Curr Biol. 2013. April 8;23(7):R286–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.050 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crawford PHC, Hoagland BW. Can herbarium records be used to map alien species invasion and native species expansion over the past 100 years? J Biogeogr. 2009;36(4):651–61.
    1. Colautti RI, Lau JA. Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation. Mol Ecol. 2015. May;24(9):1999–2017. doi: 10.1111/mec.13162 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F, Pergl J, Winter M, Weber E, et al. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature. 2015. August 19;525(7567):100–3. doi: 10.1038/nature14910 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Razanajatovo M, Maurel N, Dawson W, Essl F, Kreft H, Pergl J, et al. Plants capable of selfing are more likely to become naturalized. Nat Commun. 2016. October 31;7:13313 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13313 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grant support

This study was supported by the President’s Fund of the Max Planck Society (project “Darwin”) to HAB and by an ERC grant (AdG IMMUNEMESIS) and core funds of the Max Planck Society to DW. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.