Forced sterilization of women as discrimination
- PMID: 29450087
- PMCID: PMC5809857
- DOI: 10.1186/s40985-017-0060-9
Forced sterilization of women as discrimination
Abstract
There has been a long history of subjecting marginalized women to forced and coerced sterilization. In recent years, the practice has been documented in countries in North and South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. It has targeted women who are ethnic and racial minorities, women with disabilities, women living with HIV, and poor women. A handful of courts have issued decisions on the recent forced sterilization of marginalized women finding that such actions violate the women's rights. However, they have all failed to address the women's claims of discrimination. The failure to acknowledge that forced sterilization is at its core a violation of the prohibition of discrimination undermines efforts to eradicate the practice. It further fails to recognize that coerced and forced sterilization fundamentally seeks to deny women deemed as "unworthy" the ability to procreate. Four key principles outlined in the human rights in patient care framework highlight the importance of a finding that the prohibition of discrimination was violated in cases of forced sterilization: the need to highlight the vulnerability of marginalized populations to discrimination in health care settings; the importance of the rights of medical providers; the role of the state in addressing systemic human rights violations in health care settings; and the application of human rights to patient care. Based on these principles, it is clear that finding a violation of the prohibition of discrimination in forced sterilization cases is critical in addressing the systemic nature of the practice, acknowledging the marginalization of specific groups and effectively ending forced sterilization through addressing the underlying purpose of the practice. If litigators, non-governmental organizations and judicial officers are mindful of these principles when dealing with cases of forced sterilization, it is likely that they will be better able to eradicate forced sterilization.
Keywords: Discrimination; Human rights; Human rights in patient care; Patient care; Sexual and reproductive rights; Sterilization; Women’s rights.
Conflict of interest statement
Priti Patel is a legal independent consultant. She was the Deputy Director of the Southern Africa Litigation Centre from 2007 to 2014 where she founded the organization’s work on HIV, sex workers, women’s sexual and reproductive health, and lesbian, gay, and transgender persons. She can be contacted at priti@patel.org.nz.No ethics approval or consent to participate was necessary.The author declares that she has no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Experiences of coercion to sterilize and forced sterilization among women living with HIV in Latin America.J Int AIDS Soc. 2015 Mar 24;18(1):19462. doi: 10.7448/IAS.18.1.19462. eCollection 2015. J Int AIDS Soc. 2015. PMID: 25808633 Free PMC article.
-
Forced and coerced sterilization of women in Europe.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Aug;114(2):163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.05.002. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011. PMID: 21683952
-
Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993 Apr;8(Suppl. 1):148-59. doi: 10.1159/000263882. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993. PMID: 11653014
-
A snapshot of reproductive and sexual health and rights of women living with HIV in Asia.Oral Dis. 2020 Sep;26 Suppl 1:54-58. doi: 10.1111/odi.13390. Oral Dis. 2020. PMID: 32862544 Review.
-
International human rights and women's reproductive health.Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Mar-Apr;24(2):73-86. Stud Fam Plann. 1993. PMID: 8511808 Review.
Cited by
-
Future directions for reproductive coercion and abuse research.Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 2;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01550-3. Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 36593505 Free PMC article.
-
Contraceptive uptake in postpartum people with and without opioid use disorder and opioid use with co-occurring substance use.Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Jun 24;12:100248. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100248. eCollection 2024 Sep. Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024. PMID: 39040479 Free PMC article.
-
Caring for the Poor and Vulnerable: A Virtue Analysis of Mandated Health Insurance Compared with Healthcare Sharing Ministries.Linacre Q. 2021 Feb;88(1):82-93. doi: 10.1177/0024363920949790. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Linacre Q. 2021. PMID: 33487749 Free PMC article.
-
Rethinking systemic ableism: A response to Zagouras, Ellick, and Aulisio.Clin Ethics. 2023 Mar;18(1):7-12. doi: 10.1177/14777509221094472. Epub 2022 Apr 20. Clin Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37283273 Free PMC article.
-
"It Means Being Safe, Having Power over One's Body": Black Female Adolescent Experiences with Reproductive Health Counseling in Primary Care.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2024 Aug;37(4):389-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2024.01.165. Epub 2024 Feb 1. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38301797
References
-
- Peal TR. The continuing sterilization of undesirables in America. New Jersey: Rutgers Race and L. R; 2004;6:225.
-
- Alexander LL, Larosa JH, Bader H, Garfield S. New dimensions in women’s health. 2013.
-
- Open Society Foundations. Against her will: forced and coerced sterilization of women worldwide. 2011. Available at: https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/against-her-will-for.... Accessed 30 Nov 2016.
-
- African Gender and Media Initiative . Robbed of choice: forced and coerced sterilization experiences of women living with HIV in Kenya. 2012.
-
- International Community of Women Living with HIV/AIDS. The forced and coerced sterilization of HIV positive women in Namibia. March 2009. Available at: http://www.icw.org/files/The%20forced%20and%20coerced%20sterilization%20.... Accessed 30 Nov 2016.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
