Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 May 3;1:2.
doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6. eCollection 2016.

Sex and Gender Equity in Research: Rationale for the SAGER Guidelines and Recommended Use

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Sex and Gender Equity in Research: Rationale for the SAGER Guidelines and Recommended Use

Shirin Heidari et al. Res Integr Peer Rev. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines.

Methods: A panel of 13 experts representing nine countries developed the guidelines through a series of teleconferences, conference presentations and a 2-day workshop. An internet survey of 716 journal editors, scientists and other members of the international publishing community was conducted as well as a literature search on sex and gender policies in scientific publishing.

Results: The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines are a comprehensive procedure for reporting of sex and gender information in study design, data analyses, results and interpretation of findings.

Conclusions: The SAGER guidelines are designed primarily to guide authors in preparing their manuscripts, but they are also useful for editors, as gatekeepers of science, to integrate assessment of sex and gender into all manuscripts as an integral part of the editorial process.

Keywords: Equity; Gender; Gender bias; Guidelines; SAGER; Scientific publishing; Scientific research; Sex.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SAGER flowchart guiding editors’ initial screening of submitted manuscripts

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 52 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Coen S, Banister E, editors. What a difference sex and gender make: a gender, sex and health research casebook. Ottowa, Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2012.
    1. Hoffman DE, Tarzian AJ. The girl who cried pain: a bias against women in the treatment of pain. J Law Med Ethics. 2001;29:13–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2001.tb00037.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Sex-specific reporting of scientific research: a workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.
    1. Geller SE, Koch A, Pellettieri B, Carnes M. Inclusion, analysis, and reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials: have we made progress? J Womens Health. 2011;20:315–20. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2469. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leopold SS, Beadling L, Dobbs MB, et al. Fairness to all: gender and sex in scientific reporting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:391–2. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3397-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback