Personal Control Over Decisions to Participate in Research by Persons With Histories of Both Substance Use Disorders and Criminal Justice Supervision

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Apr;13(2):160-172. doi: 10.1177/1556264618755243. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

Abstract

Individuals must feel free to exert personal control over decisions regarding research participation. We present an examination of participants' perceived personal control over, as well as reported pressures and threats from others, influencing their decision to join a study assessing the effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone in preventing opioid dependence relapse. Most participants endorsed a strong sense of control over the decision; few reported pressures or threats. Although few in number, participants' brief narrative descriptions of the pressures and threats are illuminating and provide context for their perceptions of personal control. Based on this work, we propose a useful set of tools to help ascertain participants' sense of personal control in joining research.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00781898.

Keywords: criminal justice supervision; decision making; perceived personal control; research ethics; substance use disorder.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Criminal Law
  • Criminals / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent
  • Injections / psychology
  • Male
  • Naltrexone / therapeutic use*
  • Opiate Substitution Treatment / psychology*
  • Opioid-Related Disorders / psychology*
  • Opioid-Related Disorders / therapy
  • Patient Compliance / psychology*
  • Patient Preference / psychology*

Substances

  • Naltrexone

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00781898