Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 22;18(1):79.
doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1064-4.

Health care quality measures for children and adolescents in Foster Care: feasibility testing in electronic records

Affiliations

Health care quality measures for children and adolescents in Foster Care: feasibility testing in electronic records

Katherine J Deans et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Preventive quality measures for the foster care population are largely untested. The objective of the study is to identify healthcare quality measures for young children and adolescents in foster care and to test whether the data required to calculate these measures can be feasibly extracted and interpreted within an electronic health records or within the Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System.

Methods: The AAP Recommendations for Preventive Pediatric Health Care served as the guideline for determining quality measures. Quality measures related to well child visits, developmental screenings, immunizations, trauma-related care, BMI measurements, sexually transmitted infections and depression were defined. Retrospective chart reviews were performed on a cohort of children in foster care from a single large pediatric institution and related county. Data available in the Ohio Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System was compared to the same population studied in the electronic health record review. Quality measures were calculated as observed (received) to expected (recommended) ratios (O/E ratios) to describe the actual quantity of recommended health care that was received by individual children.

Results: Electronic health records and the Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System data frequently lacked important information on foster care youth essential for calculating the measures. Although electronic health records were rich in encounter specific clinical data, they often lacked custodial information such as the dates of entry into and exit from foster care. In contrast, Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System included robust data on custodial arrangements, but lacked detailed medical information. Despite these limitations, several quality measures were devised that attempted to accommodate these limitations.

Conclusions: In this feasibility testing, neither the electronic health records at a single institution nor the county level Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System was able to independently serve as a reliable source of data for health care quality measures for foster care youth. However, the ability to leverage both sources by matching them at an individual level may provide the complement of data necessary to assess the quality of healthcare.

Keywords: Electronic health record; Foster care; Quality measures; Statewide automated child welfare information system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved, with a waiver of informed consent, by the Nationwide Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) under the following submissions:

IRB13–00106 Feasibility Testing in EHR for Children in Foster Care.

IRB13–00564 Quality Measures for Adolescents in Foster Care.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Research Participation of Minor Adolescents in Foster Care.
    Francis JKR, Andresen JA, Guzman A, McLeigh JD, Kloster HM, Rosenthal SL. Francis JKR, et al. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021 Apr;34(2):190-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 15. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33333259 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Mangione-Smith R, McGlynn EA. Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children. Health Serv Res. 1998;33(4 Pt 2):1059–1090. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beal AC, Co JP, Dougherty D, et al. Quality measures for children's health care. Pediatrics. 2004;113(1 Pt 2):199–209. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA). Childrens Health Insurance Program CHIP https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/quality-of-care/performance-measuremen.... Accessed 4 Jan 2013.
    1. Chernoff R, Combs-Orme T, Risley-Curtiss C, Heisler A. Assessing the health status of children entering foster care. Pediatrics. 1994;93(4):594–601. - PubMed
    1. Steele JS, Buchi KF. Medical and mental health of children entering the utah foster care system. Pediatrics. 2008;122(3):e703–e709. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0360. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources