Health care quality measures for children and adolescents in Foster Care: feasibility testing in electronic records
- PMID: 29471817
- PMCID: PMC5822488
- DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-1064-4
Health care quality measures for children and adolescents in Foster Care: feasibility testing in electronic records
Abstract
Background: Preventive quality measures for the foster care population are largely untested. The objective of the study is to identify healthcare quality measures for young children and adolescents in foster care and to test whether the data required to calculate these measures can be feasibly extracted and interpreted within an electronic health records or within the Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System.
Methods: The AAP Recommendations for Preventive Pediatric Health Care served as the guideline for determining quality measures. Quality measures related to well child visits, developmental screenings, immunizations, trauma-related care, BMI measurements, sexually transmitted infections and depression were defined. Retrospective chart reviews were performed on a cohort of children in foster care from a single large pediatric institution and related county. Data available in the Ohio Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System was compared to the same population studied in the electronic health record review. Quality measures were calculated as observed (received) to expected (recommended) ratios (O/E ratios) to describe the actual quantity of recommended health care that was received by individual children.
Results: Electronic health records and the Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System data frequently lacked important information on foster care youth essential for calculating the measures. Although electronic health records were rich in encounter specific clinical data, they often lacked custodial information such as the dates of entry into and exit from foster care. In contrast, Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System included robust data on custodial arrangements, but lacked detailed medical information. Despite these limitations, several quality measures were devised that attempted to accommodate these limitations.
Conclusions: In this feasibility testing, neither the electronic health records at a single institution nor the county level Statewide Automated Child Welfare Information System was able to independently serve as a reliable source of data for health care quality measures for foster care youth. However, the ability to leverage both sources by matching them at an individual level may provide the complement of data necessary to assess the quality of healthcare.
Keywords: Electronic health record; Foster care; Quality measures; Statewide automated child welfare information system.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved, with a waiver of informed consent, by the Nationwide Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) under the following submissions:
IRB13–00106 Feasibility Testing in EHR for Children in Foster Care.
IRB13–00564 Quality Measures for Adolescents in Foster Care.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of evaluating the CHIPRA care quality measures in electronic health record data.Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):139-49. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3705. Epub 2012 Jun 18. Pediatrics. 2012. PMID: 22711724 Free PMC article.
-
Patterns of substance use among adolescents in and out of foster care: An analysis of linked health and child welfare administrative data.Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Dec;146:106473. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106473. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Child Abuse Negl. 2023. PMID: 37801757
-
Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children.Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 2):1059-90. Health Serv Res. 1998. PMID: 9776949 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Developmental Outcomes of Foster Children: A Meta-Analytic Comparison With Children From the General Population and Children at Risk Who Remained at Home.Child Maltreat. 2016 Aug;21(3):198-217. doi: 10.1177/1077559516657637. Child Maltreat. 2016. PMID: 27481915 Review.
Cited by
-
Research Participation of Minor Adolescents in Foster Care.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021 Apr;34(2):190-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 15. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33333259 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Beal AC, Co JP, Dougherty D, et al. Quality measures for children's health care. Pediatrics. 2004;113(1 Pt 2):199–209. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA). Childrens Health Insurance Program CHIP https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/quality-of-care/performance-measuremen.... Accessed 4 Jan 2013.
-
- Chernoff R, Combs-Orme T, Risley-Curtiss C, Heisler A. Assessing the health status of children entering foster care. Pediatrics. 1994;93(4):594–601. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
