Scene and human face recognition in the central vision of patients with glaucoma

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 26;13(2):e0193465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193465. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) firstly mainly affects peripheral vision. Current behavioral studies support the idea that visual defects of patients with POAG extend into parts of the central visual field classified as normal by static automated perimetry analysis. This is particularly true for visual tasks involving processes of a higher level than mere detection. The purpose of this study was to assess visual abilities of POAG patients in central vision. Patients were assigned to two groups following a visual field examination (Humphrey 24-2 SITA-Standard test). Patients with both peripheral and central defects and patients with peripheral but no central defect, as well as age-matched controls, participated in the experiment. All participants had to perform two visual tasks where low-contrast stimuli were presented in the central 6° of the visual field. A categorization task of scene images and human face images assessed high-level visual recognition abilities. In contrast, a detection task using the same stimuli assessed low-level visual function. The difference in performance between detection and categorization revealed the cost of high-level visual processing. Compared to controls, patients with a central visual defect showed a deficit in both detection and categorization of all low-contrast images. This is consistent with the abnormal retinal sensitivity as assessed by perimetry. However, the deficit was greater for categorization than detection. Patients without a central defect showed similar performances to the controls concerning the detection and categorization of faces. However, while the detection of scene images was well-maintained, these patients showed a deficit in their categorization. This suggests that the simple loss of peripheral vision could be detrimental to scene recognition, even when the information is displayed in central vision. This study revealed subtle defects in the central visual field of POAG patients that cannot be predicted by static automated perimetry assessment using Humphrey 24-2 SITA-Standard test.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Female
  • Glaucoma, Open-Angle / physiopathology
  • Glaucoma, Open-Angle / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Visual Field Tests
  • Visual Perception*

Grants and funding

ARS was supported by University Grenoble Alpes PhD grant "AGIR-POLE-CSB", https://www.communaute-univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/fr/presentation/annonces/agir-pole-634391.htm#CBS. FR was supported by Fondation de France grant "Berthe Fouassier", https://www.fondationdefrance.org/fr/fondation/fondation-berthe-fouassier. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.