Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018:162:D2301.

[Who does my leg belong to after amputation?; informed consent on amputation of body parts]

[Article in Dutch]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 29493472

[Who does my leg belong to after amputation?; informed consent on amputation of body parts]

[Article in Dutch]
B Jansen et al. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2018.

Abstract

In the Netherlands, when body parts are amputated as part of a medical procedure the patient's consent is required if this body part is used for, or subjected to, medical tests. The patient's consent is, however, rarely obtained, when body parts are discarded as 'pathological waste'. This can raise concerns, as patients have good reasons and distinct rights to demand a different fate, such as a burial or cremation, for their amputated limb. This article analyses the legal status of an amputated body part. We conclude that, legally, the amputated part does not belong to the hospital or doctor and can therefore not be disposed of at whim, in accordance with the hospital's wishes. Doctors have an obligation to actively inform their patients of their property rights over the amputated limbs and of the alternatives to disposal that are available. Doctors might find themselves exposed to tortuous liability procedures if they dispose of amputated body parts without proper consent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms