Toward a Responsibility-Catering Prioritarian Ethical Theory of Risk

Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):655-670. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0036-2. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

Abstract

Standard tools used in societal risk management such as probabilistic risk analysis or cost-benefit analysis typically define risks in terms of only probabilities and consequences and assume a utilitarian approach to ethics that aims to maximize expected utility. The philosopher Carl F. Cranor has argued against this view by devising a list of plausible aspects of the acceptability of risks that points towards a non-consequentialist ethical theory of societal risk management. This paper revisits Cranor's list to argue that the alternative ethical theory responsibility-catering prioritarianism can accommodate the aspects identified by Cranor and that the elements in the list can be used to inform the details of how to view risks within this theory. An approach towards operationalizing the theory is proposed based on a prioritarian social welfare function that operates on responsibility-adjusted utilities. A responsibility-catering prioritarian ethical approach towards managing risks is a promising alternative to standard tools such as cost-benefit analysis.

Keywords: Ethics; Philosophy of risk; Responsibility; Responsibility-catering prioritarianism; Risk management; Risk regulations.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Ethical Analysis*
  • Ethical Theory*
  • Ethicists
  • Humans
  • Public Policy
  • Risk Management / ethics*
  • Risk*
  • Social Behavior
  • Social Responsibility