Red Flags for Low Back Pain Are Not Always Really Red: A Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Commonly Used Screening Questions for Low Back Pain
- PMID: 29509613
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00134
Red Flags for Low Back Pain Are Not Always Really Red: A Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Commonly Used Screening Questions for Low Back Pain
Abstract
Background: Low back pain has a high prevalence and morbidity, and is a source of substantial health-care spending. Numerous published guidelines support the use of so-called red flag questions to screen for serious pathology in patients with low back pain. This paper examines the effectiveness of red flag questions as a screening tool for patients presenting with low back pain to a multidisciplinary academic spine center.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the cases of 9,940 patients with a chief complaint of low back pain. The patients completed a questionnaire that included several red flag questions during their first physician visit. Diagnostic data for the same clinical episode were collected from medical records and were corroborated with imaging reports. Patients who were diagnosed as having a vertebral fracture, malignancy, infection, or cauda equina syndrome were classified as having a red flag diagnosis.
Results: Specific individual red flags and combinations of red flags were associated with an increased probability of underlying serious spinal pathology, e.g., recent trauma and an age of >50 years were associated with vertebral fracture. The presence or absence of other red flags, such as night pain, was unrelated to any particular diagnosis. For instance, for patients with no recent history of infection and no fever, chills, or sweating, the presence of night pain was a false-positive finding for infection >96% of the time. In general, the absence of red flag responses did not meaningfully decrease the likelihood of a red flag diagnosis; 64% of patients with spinal malignancy had no associated red flags.
Conclusions: While a positive response to a red flag question may indicate the presence of serious disease, a negative response to 1 or 2 red flag questions does not meaningfully decrease the likelihood of a red flag diagnosis. Clinicians should use caution when utilizing red flag questions as screening tools.
Comment in
-
Should We Still Use Red Flags in the Diagnosis of Low Back Pain?: Commentary on an article by Ajay Premkumar, MD, MPH, et al.: "Red Flags for Low Back Pain Are Not Always Really Red. A Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Commonly Used Screening Questions for Low Back Pain".J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Mar 7;100(5):e31. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01391. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018. PMID: 29509627 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Red flags to screen for vertebral fracture in people presenting with low back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 24;8(8):CD014461. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014461.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37615643 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain.Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Oct;60(10):3072-80. doi: 10.1002/art.24853. Arthritis Rheum. 2009. PMID: 19790051
-
Red flags presented in current low back pain guidelines: a review.Eur Spine J. 2016 Sep;25(9):2788-802. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4684-0. Epub 2016 Jul 4. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27376890 Review.
-
Red flags to screen for vertebral fracture in patients presenting with low-back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD008643. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008643.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 38014846 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sensitivity and specificity of patient-entered red flags for lower back pain.Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.342. Epub 2018 Jun 26. Spine J. 2019. PMID: 29959102
Cited by
-
Management of low back pain and lumbosacral radicular syndrome: the Guideline of the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy (KNGF).Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Apr;60(2):292-318. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08352-7. Epub 2024 Feb 26. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024. PMID: 38407016 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing Serious Spinal Pathology Using Bayesian Network Decision Support: Development and Validation Study.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Oct 3;7:e44187. doi: 10.2196/44187. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37788068 Free PMC article.
-
Red flags to screen for vertebral fracture in people presenting with low back pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 24;8(8):CD014461. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014461.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37615643 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Model of Triage of Serious Spinal Pathologies and Therapeutic Options Based on a Delphi Study.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 11;59(7):1283. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071283. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37512094 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnosis Value of Patient Evaluation Components Applicable in Primary Care Settings for the Diagnosis of Low Back Pain: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews.J Clin Med. 2023 May 21;12(10):3581. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103581. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37240687 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
