Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Feb 23;6:33.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00033. eCollection 2018.

Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields and Redox-Responsive Pathways Linked to Cancer Drug Resistance: Insights from Co-Exposure-Based In Vitro Studies

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields and Redox-Responsive Pathways Linked to Cancer Drug Resistance: Insights from Co-Exposure-Based In Vitro Studies

Stefano Falone et al. Front Public Health. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Electrical devices currently used in clinical practice and common household equipments generate extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) that were classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as "possible carcinogenic." Assuming that ELF-MF plays a role in the carcinogenic process without inducing direct genomic alterations, ELF-MF may be involved in the promotion or progression of cancers. In particular, ELF-MF-induced responses are suspected to activate redox-responsive intracellular signaling or detoxification scavenging systems. In fact, improved protection against oxidative stress and redox-active xenobiotics is thought to provide critical proliferative and survival advantage in tumors. On this basis, an ever-growing research activity worldwide is attempting to establish whether tumor cells may develop multidrug resistance through the activation of essential cytoprotective networks in the presence of ELF fields, and how this might trigger relevant changes in tumor phenotype. This review builds a framework around how the activity of redox-responsive mediators may be controlled by co-exposure to ELF-MF and reactive oxygen species-generating agents in tumor and cancer cells, in order to clarify whether and how such potential molecular targets could help to minimize or neutralize the functional interaction between ELF-MF and malignancies.

Keywords: cancer stem cell; catalase; chemoresistance; cytotoxicity; genotoxicity; glutathione; peroxidase; reactive oxygen species.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peiris-Pagès M, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Pestell RG, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Cancer stem cell metabolism. Breast Cancer Res (2016) 18(1):55.10.1186/s13058-016-0712-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Q, Feng Y, Kennedy D. Multidrug-resistant cancer cells and cancer stem cells hijack cellular systems to circumvent systemic therapies, can natural products reverse this? Cell Mol Life Sci (2017) 74(5):777–801.10.1007/s00018-016-2362-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao J. Cancer stem cells and chemoresistance: the smartest survives the raid. Pharmacol Ther (2016) 160:145–58.10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.02.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boonstra J, Post JA. Molecular events associated with reactive oxygen species and cell cycle progression in mammalian cells. Gene (2004) 337:1–13.10.1016/j.gene.2004.04.032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pizzino G, Irrera N, Cucinotta M, Pallio G, Mannino F, Arcoraci V, et al. Oxidative stress: harms and benefits for human health. Oxid Med Cell Longev (2017) 2017:8416763.10.1155/2017/8416763 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources