A prototype for evidence-based pharmaceutical opinions to promote physician-pharmacist communication around deprescribing
- PMID: 29531631
- PMCID: PMC5843115
- DOI: 10.1177/1715163518755813
A prototype for evidence-based pharmaceutical opinions to promote physician-pharmacist communication around deprescribing
Abstract
Context: Interprofessional communication is an effective mechanism for reducing inappropriate prescriptions among older adults. Physicians' views about which elements are essential for pharmacists to include in an evidence-based pharmaceutical opinion for deprescribing remain unknown.
Objective: To develop a prototype for an evidence-based pharmaceutical opinion that promotes physician-pharmacist communication around deprescribing.
Methods: A standardized template for an evidence-based pharmaceutical opinion was developed with input from a convenience sample of 32 primary care physicians and 61 primary care pharmacists, recruited from conferences and community settings in Montreal, Canada. Participants were asked to comment on the need for clarifying treatment goals, including personalized patient data and biomarkers, highlighting evidence about drug harms, listing the credibility and source of the recommendations, providing therapeutic alternatives and formalizing official documentation of decision making. The content and format of the prototype underwent revision by community physicians and pharmacists until consensus was reached on a final recommended template.
Results: The majority of physicians (84%-97%) requested that the source of the deprescribing recommendations be cited, that alternative management options be provided and that the information be tailored to the patient. Sixteen percent of physicians expressed concern about the information in the opinions being too dense. Pharmacists also questioned the length of the opinion and asked that additional space be provided for the physician's response. A statement was added making the opinion a valid prescription upon receipt of a signature from physicians. Compared to a nonstandardized opinion, the majority of pharmacists believed the template was easier to use, more evidence based, more time efficient and more likely to lead to deprescribing.
Conclusion: Physicians and pharmacists endorsed a standardized template that promotes interprofessional communication for deprescribing (available at https://www.deprescribingnetwork.ca/pharmaceutical-opinions). The outcome of the D-Prescribe trial will determine the effectiveness of these evidence-based pharmaceutical opinions on deprescribing processes and outcomes. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2018;151:xx-xx.
Similar articles
-
Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Educational Intervention on Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions in Older Adults: The D-PRESCRIBE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1889-1898. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16131. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30422193 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Led Deprescribing of NSAIDs in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 May;68(5):1090-1097. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16388. Epub 2020 Feb 27. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020. PMID: 32105355 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a joint general practitioner-pharmacist intervention on the implementation of benzodiazepine deprescribing in older adults (BESTOPH-MG trial): protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Aug 25;10:1228883. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1228883. eCollection 2023. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023. PMID: 37711743 Free PMC article.
-
Deprescribing Benzodiazepines in Older Patients: Impact of Interventions Targeting Physicians, Pharmacists, and Patients.Drugs Aging. 2018 Jun;35(6):493-521. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0544-4. Drugs Aging. 2018. PMID: 29705831 Review.
-
Majority rules: how good are we at aggregating convergent opinions?Evol Hum Sci. 2019 May 31;1:e6. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.6. eCollection 2019. Evol Hum Sci. 2019. PMID: 37588400 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Deprescribing benzodiazepine receptor agonists in older adults: a mixed-methods study to adapt the Canadian D-PRESCRIBE intervention to the Belgian community setting.BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e085396. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085396. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39153767 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to guide the successful implementation of deprescribing in community practice: Lessons learned from the front line.Can Pharm J (Ott). 2024 May;157(3):133-142. doi: 10.1177/17151635241240737. Epub 2024 Apr 13. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2024. PMID: 38737354 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges and opportunities in creating a deprescribing program in the emergency department: A qualitative study.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jan;71(1):62-76. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18047. Epub 2022 Oct 18. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023. PMID: 36258309 Free PMC article.
-
Influencers on deprescribing practice of primary healthcare providers in Nova Scotia: An examination using behavior change frameworks.Med Access Point Care. 2020 Jun 3;4:2399202620922507. doi: 10.1177/2399202620922507. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Med Access Point Care. 2020. PMID: 36204093 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Educational Intervention on Inappropriate Medication Prescriptions in Older Adults: The D-PRESCRIBE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1889-1898. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16131. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30422193 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Canadian Pharmacists Association. A review of pharmacy services in Canada and the health and economic evidence 2016. Available: https://www.pharmacists.ca/cpha-ca/assets/File/cpha-on-the-issues/Pharma... (accessed Aug. 6, 2017).
-
- Dumas J, Matte J. Characteristics of pharmaceutical opinions written in a Quebec community pharmacy. Ann Pharmacother 1992;26(6):835-9. - PubMed
-
- Régie de l’assurance maladie du Québec. Entente entre l’association québécoise des pharmaciens propriétaires et le ministre de la santé et des services sociaux 2015-2018. Available: www.ramq.gouv.qc.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/professionnels/manuels/260-p... (accessed Aug. 2, 2017).
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources