Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 9, 256
eCollection

Raising Awareness for the Replication Crisis in Clinical Psychology by Focusing on Inconsistencies in Psychotherapy Research: How Much Can We Rely on Published Findings From Efficacy Trials?

Affiliations

Raising Awareness for the Replication Crisis in Clinical Psychology by Focusing on Inconsistencies in Psychotherapy Research: How Much Can We Rely on Published Findings From Efficacy Trials?

Michael P Hengartner. Front Psychol.

Abstract

No abstract available

Keywords: allegiance; clinical psychology; effectiveness; efficacy; methodology; psychotherapy research; publication bias; replication.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Aarts A. A., Anderson J. E., Anderson C. J., Attridge P. R., Attwood A., Axt J., et al. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349:aac4716 10.1126/science.aac4716 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakker M., van Dijk A., Wicherts J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 543–554. 10.1177/1745691612459060 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bandelow B., Reitt M., Röver C., Michaelis S., Görlich Y., Wedekind D. (2015). Efficacy of treatments for anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis. Int. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 30, 183–192. 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000078 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bekelman J. E., Li Y., Gross C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA 289, 454–465. 10.1001/jama.289.4.454 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Calvert S. L., Appelbaum M., Dodge K. A., Graham S., Nagayama Hall G. C., Hamby S., et al. . (2017). The american psychological association task force assessment of violent video games: science in the service of public interest. Am. Psychol. 72, 126–143. 10.1037/a0040413 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback