Negative stereotypes as motivated justifications for moral exclusion

J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(3):257-269. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1456396. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

Abstract

We investigated the connection between moral exclusion of outgroups and on the one hand, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), and social dominance orientation (SDO) on the other. We assumed that both RWA and SDO would increase the tendency to place other groups out of the scope of justice. However, we also tested whether negative stereotypes about an outgroup's threatening and norm-violating misbehavior would serve as a justification for moral exclusion. These assumptions were tested in connection with Roma, Jewish, and Muslim people as target groups in the Hungarian context (N = 441). In line with our hypotheses, we found that both RWA and SDO had an indirect effect on moral exclusion mediated by negative stereotypes about the particular target group. Our findings suggested that negative stereotypes were more important legitimizing factors for RWA than for SDO. Our results highlight the benefits of interpreting the process of moral exclusion as an outcome of motivated social cognition.

Keywords: Moral exclusion; motivated social cognition; negative stereotyping; right-wing authoritarianism; social dominance orientation.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Authoritarianism*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hungary
  • Islam
  • Jews
  • Male
  • Minority Groups*
  • Morals*
  • Politics*
  • Roma
  • Social Dominance*
  • Social Marginalization*
  • Stereotyping*
  • Young Adult