Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 29619782
- PMCID: PMC5903119
- DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.103
Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses present results by combining and analyzing data from different studies conducted on similar research topics. In recent years, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been actively performed in various fields including anesthesiology. These research methods are powerful tools that can overcome the difficulties in performing large-scale randomized controlled trials. However, the inclusion of studies with any biases or improperly assessed quality of evidence in systematic reviews and meta-analyses could yield misleading results. Therefore, various guidelines have been suggested for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses to help standardize them and improve their quality. Nonetheless, accepting the conclusions of many studies without understanding the meta-analysis can be dangerous. Therefore, this article provides an easy introduction to clinicians on performing and understanding meta-analyses.
Keywords: Anesthesiology; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trial; Systematic review.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50. Pain Physician. 2009. PMID: 19787009
-
Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):1018-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001452. Anesth Analg. 2016. PMID: 27537925 Review.
-
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls.Eur Heart J. 2014 Dec 14;35(47):3336-45. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu424. Eur Heart J. 2014. PMID: 25416325
-
Low-Dose Aspirin for the Prevention of Morbidity and Mortality From Preeclampsia: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Apr. Report No.: 14-05207-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Apr. Report No.: 14-05207-EF-1. PMID: 24783270 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.Natl Med J India. 2004 Mar-Apr;17(2):86-95. Natl Med J India. 2004. PMID: 15141602
Cited by
-
Unraveling the Role of Maternal Serum Ferritin Levels in Preterm Delivery: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus. 2024 Feb 20;16(2):e54515. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54515. eCollection 2024 Feb. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38516441 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does millet consumption contribute to raising blood hemoglobin levels compared to regular refined staples?: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Nutr. 2024 Feb 12;11:1305394. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1305394. eCollection 2024. Front Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38419846 Free PMC article.
-
Extended Infusion of Beta-Lactams and Glycopeptides: A New Era in Pediatric Care? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Feb 7;13(2):164. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13020164. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38391550 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Knotted or knotless double-row rotator cuff repair retear rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Oct 18;4(1):15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.09.008. eCollection 2024 Feb. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023. PMID: 38323203 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dietary mycotoxin exposure and human health risks: A protocol for a systematic review.Environ Int. 2024 Feb;184:108456. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108456. Epub 2024 Jan 20. Environ Int. 2024. PMID: 38277998 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kang H. Statistical considerations in meta-analysis. Hanyang Med Rev. 2015;35:23–32.
-
- Uetani K, Nakayama T, Ikai H, Yonemoto N, Moher D. Quality of reports on randomized controlled trials conducted in Japan: evaluation of adherence to the CONSORT statement. Intern Med. 2009;48:307–13. - PubMed
-
- Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–900. - PubMed
-
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1–34. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
