Infants learn a rule predicated on the relation same but fail to simultaneously learn a rule predicated on the relation different

Cognition. 2018 Aug:177:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 7.

Abstract

In two experiments, we assessed whether infants are able to learn rules predicated on two abstract relations linked by negation: same and different (not same). In an anticipatory looking paradigm, the relation between successive colored geometrical shapes predicted the location where a puppet would appear next. In Experiment 1, 7-month-olds learned and generalized a rule predicated on the relation same, but not a rule predicated on the relation different. Similarly, in Experiment 2, 12-month-olds learned a rule predicated on the relation same-shape, but not a rule predicated on the relation different-shape. Comparing our data with that from previous experiments in the speech domain, we found no effect of age, modality or rule complexity. We conclude that, in the first year of life, infants already possess a representation of the abstract relation same, which serves as input to a rule. In contrast, we find no evidence that they represent the relation different.

Keywords: Abstract representations; Cognitive development; Infants; Same different.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Choice Behavior
  • Concept Formation*
  • Discrimination Learning*
  • Generalization, Psychological
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual*