Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):274.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3062-5.

Experiences of primary care physicians and staff following lean workflow redesign

Affiliations

Experiences of primary care physicians and staff following lean workflow redesign

Dorothy Y Hung et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In response to growing pressures on primary care, leaders have introduced a wide range of workforce and practice innovations, including team redesigns that delegate some physician tasks to nonphysicians. One important question is how such innovations affect care team members, particularly in view of growing dissatisfaction and burnout among healthcare professionals. We examine the work experiences of primary care physicians and staff after implementing Lean-based workflow redesigns. This included co-locating physician and medical assistant dyads, delegating significant responsibilities to nonphysician staff, and mandating greater coordination and communication among all care team members.

Methods: The redesigns were implemented and scaled in three phases across 46 primary care departments in a large ambulatory care delivery system. We fielded 1164 baseline and 1333 follow-up surveys to physicians and other nonphysician staff (average 73% response rate) to assess workforce engagement (e.g., job satisfaction, motivation), perceptions of the work environment, and job-related burnout. We conducted multivariate regressions to detect changes in experiences after the redesign, adjusting for respondent characteristics and clustering of within-clinic responses.

Results: We found that both physicians and nonphysician staff reported higher levels of engagement and teamwork after implementing redesigns. However, they also experienced higher levels of burnout and perceptions of the workplace as stressful. Trends were the same for both occupational groups, but the increased reports of stress were greater among physicians. Additionally, members of all clinics, except for the pilot site that developed the new workflows, reported higher burnout, while perceptions of workplace stress increased in all clinics after the redesign.

Conclusions: Our findings partially align with expectations of work redesign as a route to improving physician and staff experiences in delivering care. Although teamwork and engagement increased, the redesigns in our study were not enough to moderate long-standing challenges facing primary care. Yet higher levels of empowerment and engagement, as observed in the pilot clinic, may be particularly effective in facilitating improvements while combating fatigue. To help practices cope with increasing burdens, interventions must directly benefit healthcare professionals without overtaxing an already overstretched workforce.

Keywords: Organizational innovation; Patient care team; Primary care redesign; Work environment, Professional burnout.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study activities were conducted with approval from the Institutional Review Board (protocol #12–06-143). Physicians and staff completed the surveys as part of their regular duties, and consent was implied with completion of the survey.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Changes in Physician and Staff Experiences After Lean Workflow Redesigns. Reference group: Baseline survey. Note: All models are adjusted for respondent characteristics, including gender, age, race/ ethnicity, education, department tenure, and clinic phase of implementation. **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bodenheimer TS, Smith MD. Primary care: proposed solutions to the physician shortage without training more physicians. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32(11):1881–1886. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0234. - DOI - PubMed
    1. VanLare JM, Conway PH. Value-based purchasing--national programs to move from volume to value. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):292–295. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1204939. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Five Year Forward View [www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf].
    1. Friedman A, Hahn KA, Etz R, Rehwinkel-Morfe AM, Miller WL, Nutting PA, Jaén CR, Shaw EK, Crabtree BF. A typology of primary care workforce innovations in the United States since 2000. Med Care. 2014;52(2):101–111. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000043. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Margolius D, Bodenheimer T. Transforming primary care: from past practice to the practice of the future. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(5):779–784. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0045. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources