Bibliometric study of articles on skeletal Class II malocclusions published in four high impact factor journals

Int Orthod. 2018 Jun;16(2):374-383. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

Abstract

Objective: Perform a bibliometric analysis of the orthodontic literature on skeletal Class II malocclusions during the first decade of the 21st century.

Materials and methods: A retrospective, observational, and comprehensive study ranging from January the first 2001 to December 31 2010, based on the articles published in four high impact factor orthodontic journals: Angle Orthod, OCR, EJO, and AJODO (Quotation Report Newspaper of the Scientific Information Institute).

Results: In the 4565 reviewed articles, only 338 were published on Class II malocclusions. Brazil, the United States, Turkey, and Germany are the nationalities, which have published the most. The cross-sectional descriptive studies represent 33%, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) 10.5%, meta-analyses 0.3%.

Discussion and conclusion: Kanavakis et al. (2006) reported 72.34% of original articles, 2.83% of synthetic reviews, 8.89% of case reports, and 15.75% of unclassifiable articles. In conclusion, searchers in Orthodontics are invited to publish more clinical trials on skeletal Class II malocclusions.

Keywords: Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Skeletal Class II malocclusions.

Publication types

  • Historical Article

MeSH terms

  • Bibliometrics*
  • History, 21st Century
  • Humans
  • Journal Impact Factor*
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II*
  • Orthodontics / classification
  • Orthodontics / statistics & numerical data
  • Periodicals as Topic
  • Publishing / history
  • Publishing / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies