A new technique for hepatic parenchymal transection using an articulating bipolar 5 cm radiofrequency device: results from the first 100 procedures

HPB (Oxford). 2018 Sep;20(9):829-833. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

Abstract

Background: Parenchymal transection(PT) still remains a challenge in liver resection. The outcomes of the first experience of a novel vessel-sealer for hepatic transection were assessed.

Methods: A bipolar articulating vessel-sealer (Caiman®, Aesculap Inc., Center Valley, PA) was used in 100 liver resections through both open (OLR) and laparoscopic (LLR) approaches. All data were prospectively collected into an IRB-approved department database, and clinical, surgical and perioperative parameters were analyzed.

Results: Fifty patients underwent OLR and 50 patients underwent LLR. Eighty hepatectomies were performed for malignancy. Median number of tumors was 1, with the largest focus measuring an average of 5.1 cm. Forty-nine of the procedures were major liver resections. Parenchymal transection time was 29.9 ± 3.1 min in OLR and 29.9 ± 3.6 min in LLR. Median estimated blood loss was 300 cc (Inter-quartile range (IQR) 100-575 cc). Median hospital stay was 6 days for open and 3 days for laparoscopic procedures. Ninety-day complication rate was 8% without any mortality. Bile leak rate was 4%. Staplers were used for parenchymal transection in 16 cases.

Conclusion: This study introduces a new multifunctional device into the armamentarium of the liver surgeon. In our experience, this device facilitated the parenchymal transection by adding speed and consolidating the amount of instrumentation used in liver resection without increasing complications.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Databases, Factual
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Hepatectomy / adverse effects
  • Hepatectomy / instrumentation*
  • Hepatectomy / methods
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiofrequency Ablation / adverse effects
  • Radiofrequency Ablation / instrumentation*
  • Risk Factors
  • Surgical Instruments*
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome